- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Social and Scientific Method or What Do We Make of the Distinction Between the Natural and the Social Sciences?
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11 (3):335-359 (1981)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Essential Nature of the Method of the Natural Sciences: Response to A. T. Nuyen's "Truth, Method, and Objectivity: Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method".Joseph Becker - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):73-76.
Karl Popper's political philosophy of social science.Geoff Stokes - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):56-79.
Natural science, social science, and democratic practice: Some political implications of the distinction between the natural and the human sciences.Marvin Stauch - 1992 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (3):337-356.
Social Life and Social Science: The Significance of the Naturalist/Intentionalist Dispute.Nancy C. M. Hartsock - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:325 - 345.
Objectivity in social science: Toward a hermeneutical evolutionary theory.Ricardo Waizbort - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):151-162.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-27
Downloads
92 (#582,055)
6 months
13 (#915,714)
2012-08-27
Downloads
92 (#582,055)
6 months
13 (#915,714)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Societal Readiness Thinking Process 2.0: Incorporating Epistemic Reflexivity for Responsible Innovation.Robert Braun, Michael J. Bernstein, Arnab Chakraborty, Johannes Starkbaum & Florian Winkler - 2025 - Science and Engineering Ethics 31 (6):42.
What does the double hermeneutic explain/justify?William Lynch - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (2):193 – 204.
Scientificity before Scientism: The Invention of Cultural Research in German Studies of Antiquity 1800–1850.Monika Krause - 2024 - Theory and Society 53 (4):953-969.
Una comprensión (in)material de las técnicas. A propósito de fomentar vínculos entre las humanidades y los Estudios de la Ciencia y la Tecnología.David Antolínez Uribe - 2022 - Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana 44 (128).
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The structure of scientific revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1970 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation