What’s in God’s name: literary forerunners and philosophical allies of the imjaslavie debate [Book Review]

Studies in East European Thought 64 (3-4):163-181 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore the interaction between a tradition that belongs originally to the realm of orthodox contemplative monasticism (i.e., hesychasm) and nineteenth-and early twentieth-century Russian intellectuals. In the first part, this paper will explore how hesychasm gradually penetrated nineteenthcentury secular culture; a special focus will be on the hermitage of Optina Pustyn' and its renowned elders, as well as their appeal to members of the Optina-intelligentsia, especially Fëdor Dostoevskij. Then, attention will shift to the imjaslavie controversy at the beginning of the twentieth century, which flared up initially as a dispute between Athonite monks and reached a sad culmination in 1912-1913 with a manu militari intervention by troops of the Russian Holy Synod. However, the debate was taken up by some prominent intellectuals of the Russian religious renaissance, such as Pavel Florenskij, Nikolaj Berdjaev, and Sergej Bulgakov, who explicitly sided with the imjaslavcy ("Glorifiers of the Name") and actively stepped into the debate

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Literary critics in a new era.Martin Paulsen - 2008 - Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):251 - 260.
Self-knowledge and the self.Thomas W. Smythe - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26 (January):287-294.
The Moral Argument For The Non-Existence Of God.Thomas Krettek - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):329-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-11-07

Downloads
127 (#358,329)

6 months
27 (#359,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?