Much ado about nothing: theories of space and vacuum from the Middle Ages to the scientific revolution

New York: Cambridge University Press (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to provide a description of the major ideas about void space within and beyond the world that were formulated between the fourteenth and early eighteenth centuries. The second part of the book - on infinite, extracosmic void space - is of special significance. The significance of Professor Grant's account is twofold: it provides the first comprehensive and detailed description of the scholastic Aristotelian arguments for and against the existence of void space; and it presents (again for the first time) an analysis of the possible influence of scholastic ideas and arguments on the interpretations of space proposed by the nonscholastic authors who made the Scientific Revolution possible. The concluding chapter of the book is unique in not only describing the conceptualizations of space proposed by the makers of the Scientific Revolution, but in assessing the role of readily available scholastic ideas on the conception of space adopted for the Newtonian world.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Void.Frank Close - 2010 - Sterling.
Concepts of space.Max Jammer - 1969 - Cambridge, Mass.,: Harvard University Press.
Space: in science, art, and society.François Penz, Gregory Radick & Robert Howell (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Philosophy of Vacuum.Simon Saunders & Harvey R. Brown (eds.) - 1991 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
127 (#358,480)

6 months
9 (#1,232,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Spinoza on Space and Motion.Stephen Harrop - 2025 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 15 (1):177-208.

View all 85 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references