Locke on Midwifery and Childbirth: A Glimpse of a Sexist Epistemology?

In Jessica Gordon-Roth & Shelley Weinberg, The Lockean Mind. New York, NY: Routledge (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter I explore whether what’s come to be known as Locke’s ‘Midwifery Notes’ reveals that Locke has a tendency toward a sexist epistemology. I argue that it doesn’t appear as if Locke is challenging women as epistemic agents per se in this document, but rather the efficacy of midwives. I then consider whether Locke has the kind of attitude that undergirds the eventual divide between obstetrics and midwifery as it arises in the US—a divide taken to be teeming with sexist assumptions on the obstetrics’ side. I argue that this kind of reading is ruled out given what Locke says about the practices of midwives in the ‘Midwifery Notes’ and what he says about medical practice more generally in ‘Anatomia.’ Nevertheless, there is something different about Locke’s tone in the ‘Midwifery Notes’ and it’s worth considering how the trope of the ‘meddling’ or ‘useless’ woman is playing a role in this often overlooked text.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Claiming an Ethic of Care for midwifery.Jennifer MacLellan - 2014 - Nursing Ethics 21 (7):803-811.
Locke on the Ontology of Persons.Jessica Gordon-Roth - 2015 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):97-123.
Midwifery and Epistemic Virtue in the Theaetetus.Dylan S. Bailey - 2022 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (1):1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jessica Gordon-Roth
University of Minnesota

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references