Explanation and Partiality in Semantic Theory

In Alexis Burgess & Brett Sherman, Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 259-292 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter argues for a form of partiality in semantics. In particular, it argues that semantics, narrowly construed as part of our linguistic competence, is only a partial determinant of truth‐conditional content. Likewise, truth‐conditional semantic theories in linguistics function as partial theories of content. It offers an account of where and how this partiality arises, which focuses on how lexical meaning combines elements of distinctively linguistic competence with elements from our broader cognitive resources. This account shows how we can accommodate some partiality in semantic theories without falling into skepticism about semantics or its place in linguistic theory. Along the way, the chapter reexamines the roles disquotation and model theory play in semantic theories. It argues that disquotation plays an ineliminable role, but that this shows us a way in which semantic theories are explanatorily partial.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
21 (#1,809,886)

6 months
21 (#520,043)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Glanzberg
Rutgers - New Brunswick

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references