What is So Special About Contemporary CG Faces? Semiotics of MetaHumans

Topoi 41 (4):821-834 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyses the features of the 2021 software for the creation of ultrarealistic digital characters “MetaHuman Creator” and reflects on the causes of such perceived effect of realism to understand if the faces produced with such software represent an actual novelty from an academic standpoint. Such realism is first of all defined as the result of semio-cognitive processes which trigger interpretative habits specifically related to faces. These habits are then related to the main properties of any realistic face: being face-looking, face-meaning and face-acting. These properties, in turn, are put in relation with our interactions with faces in terms of face detection, face recognition, face reading and face agency. Within this theoretical framework, we relate the characteristics of these artificial faces with such interpretative habits. To do so, we first of all make an examination of the technological features behind both the software and the digital faces it produces. This analysis highlights four main points of interest: the mathematical accuracy, the scanned database, the high level of details and the transformative capacities of these artificial faces. We then relate these characteristics with the cultural and cognitive aspects involved in recognizing and granting meaning to faces. This reveals how metahuman faces differs from previous artificial faces in terms of indexicality, intersubjectivity, informativity and irreducibility. But it also reveals some limits of such effect of reality in terms of intentionality and historical context. This examination consequently brings us to conclude that metahuman faces are qualitatively different from previous artificial faces and, in the light of their potentials and limits, to highlight four main lines of future research based on our findings.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Winfried Nöth & Kalevi Kull - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):9-11.
Are faces special?Elinor McKone & Rachel Robbins - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby, Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 149--176.
The Promise of Legal Semiotics.Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahy & Annabelle Mooney - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (4):381-386.
Peer Disagreement: Special Cases.Eric Wiland - 2018 - Logos and Episteme 9 (2):221-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-26

Downloads
65 (#922,704)

6 months
9 (#1,232,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Posthumous Digital Face: A Semiotic and Legal Semiotic Perspective.Giuditta Bassano & Margaux Cerutti - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (3):769-791.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fake News, Relevant Alternatives, and the Degradation of Our Epistemic Environment.Christopher Blake-Turner - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1:3148-3168.
Mythologies.Roland Barthes & Annette Lavers - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (4):563-564.
Types and tokens.Linda Wetzel - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 11 references / Add more references