Response to de Bruin and Gallagher: embodied simulation as reuse is a productive explanation of a basic form of mind-reading

Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (2):99-100 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

de Bruin & Gallagher suggest that the view of embodied simulation put forward in our recent article lacks explanatory power. We argue that the notion of reuse of mental states represented with a bodily format provides a convincing simulational account of the mirroring mechanism and its role in mind -reading

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-19

Downloads
126 (#362,233)

6 months
14 (#864,091)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Corrado Sinigaglia
Università degli Studi di Milano

References found in this work

What is so special about embodied simulation?Vittorio Gallese & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (11):512-519.
Understanding simulation.Susan Hurley - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3):755-774.
Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. [REVIEW]Vittorio Gallese - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):23-48.

Add more references