A Defense of the Concept of Nature

Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 56 (1):49-74 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of nature is under attack from a number of contemporary researchers on ecology. This seems alarming in light of the current struggle to establish the anthropogenic, i.e., non-natural origin of climate change and mass extinction. This paper selects three examples of ‘nature denial’ by influential writers—Steven Vogel, Timothy Morton, and Bruno Latour—and tries to show that without a concept of nature, their theories are incoherent. Finally, the paper turns to Gernot Böhme for a philosophy of body and nature that can evade the aporias in which the three other writers are entangled.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Nature Natural? And Other Linguistic Conundrums.David Utsler - 2018 - Environmental Philosophy 15 (1):77-89.
Gernot Böhme’s Sketch for a Weather Phenomenology.Sune Frølund - 2018 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 51 (1):142-161.
Gernot Böhmes atmosfæreæstetik og vejrfænomenologi.Sune Frølund - 2016 - Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 5 (2):19-37.
Aporias of Ecological Thought.Aidan Tynan - 2022 - Theory, Culture and Society 39 (5):3-21.
What is Nature in the Epoch of the Anthropocene?Diana Soeiro - 2016 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (48):63-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-31

Downloads
84 (#664,718)

6 months
25 (#404,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sune Frølund
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references