Achievements and fallacies in Hume's account of infinite divisibility

Hume Studies 20 (1):85-101 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout history, almost all mathematicians, physicists and philosophers have been of the opinion that space and time are infinitely divisible. That is, it is usually believed that space and time do not consist of atoms, but that any piece of space and time of non-zero size, however small, can itself be divided into still smaller parts. This assumption is included in geometry, as in Euclid, and also in the Euclidean and non- Euclidean geometries used in modern physics. Of the few who have denied that space and time are infinitely divisible, the most notable are the ancient atomists, and Berkeley and Hume. All of these assert not only that space and time might be atomic, but that they must be. Infinite divisibility is, they say, impossible on purely conceptual grounds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Kant on the infinite divisibility of space.John Watson - 1886 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20 (2):219 - 221.
From inexactness to certainty: The change in Hume's conception of geometry.Vadim Batitsky - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,447 (#29,666)

6 months
173 (#70,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Franklin
University of New South Wales

References found in this work

Image and Mind.Stephen Michael Kosslyn - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Abstract. - 2011 - Dialogue and Universalism 21 (4):447-449.
The Plato cult and other philosophical follies.David Stove - 1991 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Principles of Human Knowledge: And, Three Dialogues.George Berkeley - 1988 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by Howard Robinson & George Berkeley.

View all 19 references / Add more references