The debate between Whewell and Mill on the nature of scientific induction

In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori, Handbook of the history of logic. Boston: Elsevier. pp. 10--93 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

View all bargains

Buy this book

Find it on Amazon.com

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mill's System of Logic.David Godden - 2014 - In W. J. Mander, The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 44-70.
History and scientific practice in the construction of an adequate philosophy of science: revisiting a Whewell/Mill debate.Aaron D. Cobb - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
The Whewell-mill debate in a nutshell.Malcolm Forster - manuscript
The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado about Induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (2):159-198.
Scientific Method, Induction, and Probability: The Whewell–De Morgan Debate on Baconianism, 1830s–1850s.Lukas M. Verburgt - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (1):134-163.
Laura Snyder, Reforming philosophy. [REVIEW]Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2009 - Rivista di Filosofia 100 (2):324-325.
John Stuart mill on induction and hypotheses.Struan Jacobs - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83.
The problem of Whewell’s idealism.Andrew Cooper - forthcoming - British Journal for the History of Philosophy:1-22.
Induzione e fondazione. Un caso di studio sulla ricezione tedesca del tardo empirismo inglese.Francesco Pisano - 2020 - Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 1 (XXXIII).
The Reception of Positivism in Whewell, Mill and Brentano.Arnaud Dewalque - 2022 - In Ion Tănăsescu, Alexandru Bejinariu, Susan Krantz Gabriel & Constantin Stoenescu, Brentano and the Positive Philosophy of Comte and Mill: With Translations of Original Writings on Philosophy as Science by Franz Brentano. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 245-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
79 (#724,210)

6 months
8 (#1,339,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Malcolm Forster
Malcolm Forster
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

William Whewell’s Semantic Account of Induction.Corey Dethier - 2018 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 8 (1):141-156.
Historical Narratives and Understanding.Stefan Petkov - 2021 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):33-44.
Hacia una Teoría Consiliente de la Representación Científica.Maribel Barroso - 2023 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 27 (2):235-261.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references