Being in Relation, Being through Change

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (6):681-687 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethics exists among beings that can relate to one another and who can create change in one another. Although this may appear as a simple truism, the implications of relation and change in bioethics are manifold. For instance, one can relate not only to others, but also can enter into self-relation by relating to oneself. Self-relation problematizes autonomy insofar as one does not have immediate access to all of oneself and so therefore also does not immediately fully determine oneself in the way that an uncomplicated understanding of autonomy might imply. This article proceeds as a preliminary exposition of the concepts of relation and change as they apply to bioethics, particularly as they inform autonomy, action theory, and the porous subject.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
83 (#676,055)

6 months
23 (#455,094)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant on Human Dignity.Oliver Sensen - 2011 - Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection.Paul Formosa - 2017 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dignity, Honour, and Human Rights.Rachel Bayefsky - 2013 - Political Theory 41 (6):809-837.
The history of autonomy in medicine from antiquity to principlism.Toni C. Saad - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (1):125-137.

View all 13 references / Add more references