Omniscience, Freedom, and Dependence

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):346-367 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Several theorists (Merricks, Westphal, and McCall) have recently claimed to offer a novel way to respond to the dilemma of freedom and foreknowledge, rooted in Molina's insight that God's beliefs depend on what we do, rather than the other way around. In this paper we argue that these responses either beg the question, or else are dressed-up versions of Ockhamism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Omniscience, Freedom, and Dependence.Neal A. Tognazzini - 2016 - In John Martin Fischer, Our Fate: Essays on God and Free Will. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 214-234.
Foreknowledge and Freedom.Trenton Merricks - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):567-586.
The Truth about Freedom.Patrick Todd - 2016 - In John Martin Fischer, Our Fate: Essays on God and Free Will. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 181-197.
Fischer on Foreknowledge and Explanatory Dependence.Philip Swenson - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (4):51-61.
The Truth about Foreknowledge.Patrick Todd - 2016 - In John Martin Fischer, Our Fate: Essays on God and Free Will. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 198-213.
Our Fate: Essays on God and Free Will.John Martin Fischer (ed.) - 2016 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Do God's Beliefs about the Future Depend on the Future?T. Ryan Byerly - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:124-9.

Analytics