Meme-making: Poaching, Reappropriation, or Bricolage?

Abstract

Memes are a prominent example of a kind of digital artifact. It is widely agreed that an integral component of meme-making is the way in which it makes use of other existing material. In this paper, I examine three different ways of understanding this making use of. First, it has been seen in economic terms, as a kind of poaching. Secondly, the cultural concept of (re)appropriation has been deployed. Finally, Lévi-Strauss’s notion of bricolage is often mentioned. I argue that despite some interesting insights deriving from the first two approaches, it is the third that gives the most comprehensive and interesting take on meme-making.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-18

Downloads
312 (#141,524)

6 months
126 (#104,691)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Evnine
University of Miami

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Savage Mind.Claude Lvi-Strauss - 1968 - University Of Chicago Press.
Slurs and appropriation: an echoic account.Claudia Bianchi - 2014 - Journal of Pragmatics 66:35–44.
Cultural Appropriation Without Cultural Essentialism?Erich Hatala Matthes - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (2):343-366.
A Philosophy of Computer Art.Dominic Lopes - 2009 - New York: Routledge.

View all 8 references / Add more references