Ontic structural realism as a metaphysics of objects

In Alisa Bokulich & Peter Bokulich, Scientific Structuralism. Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 143-159 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper spells out five different accounts of the relationship between objects and relations three of which are versions of ontic structural realism. We argue that the distinction between objects and properties, including relations, is merely a conceptual one by contrast to an ontological one: properties, including relations, are modes, that is the concrete, particular ways in which objects exist. We then set out moderate OSR as the view according to which irreducible relations are central ways in which the fundamental physical objects exist. Physical structures thus consist in objects for whom it is essential that they are related in certain ways. There hence are objects, but they do not possess an intrinsic identity. This view can also admit intrinsic properties as ways in which objects exist provided that these do not amount to identity conditions for the objects. Finally, we indicate how this view can take objective modality into account.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Structures, Objects, and Reality. Part 1.Vladislav E. Terekhovich - 2022 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (3):166-184.
The Structural Metaphysics of Quantum Theory and General Relativity.Vincent Lam & Michael Esfeld - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):243-258.
Substance in the Metaphysics of Quantum Physics.Michael Esfeld - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):759–786.
The Reality of Relations.Michael Esfeld - 2016 - In Anna Marmodoro & David Yates, The Metaphysics of Relations. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 218-234.
The Doctrine of Internal Relations.Christian Milord - 1985 - Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park
Ontic structural realism and quantum field theory: Are there intrinsic properties at the most fundamental level of reality?Philipp Berghofer - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:176-188.
Ontic structural realism and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Vincent Lam & Michael Esfeld - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (1):77–99.
Explaining identity and distinctness.Erica Shumener - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (7):2073-2096.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-10

Downloads
751 (#77,598)

6 months
137 (#98,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Esfeld
University of Lausanne
Vincent Lam
University of Bern

Citations of this work

Interpreting Quantum Entanglement: Steps towards Coherentist Quantum Mechanics.Matteo Morganti & Claudio Calosi - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):865-891.
Towards a New Scientific Realism.Jan Voosholz - 2025 - Cham: Springer Nature.
Structural Realism.James Ladyman - 2012 - In Ed Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Priority and Particle Physics: Ontic Structural Realism as a Fundamentality Thesis.Kerry McKenzie - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (2):353-380.

View all 90 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Don Ross, David Spurrett & John G. Collier.
Philosophical papers.David Kellogg Lewis - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The metaphysics within physics.Tim Maudlin - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - In James Ladyman & Don Ross, Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized. New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 159 references / Add more references