Vision Reanimated

Abstract

Computer vision systems are, on most counts, poor performers, when compared to their biological counterparts. The reason for this may be that computer vision is handicapped by an unreasonable assumption regarding what it means to see, which became prevalent as the notions of intrinsic images and of representation by reconstruction took over the field in the late 1970’s. Learning from biological vision may help us to overcome this handicap.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On what it means to see, and what we can do about it.Shimon Edelman - 2008 - In Sven J. Dickinson, Aleš Leonardis, Bernt Schiele & Michael J. Tarr, Object Categorization: Computer and Human Vision Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Biological and Computer Vision.Gabriel Kreiman - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
124 (#371,092)

6 months
57 (#156,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shimon Edelman
Cornell University

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems.Charles K. West & James J. Gibson - 1969 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 3 (1):142.

View all 15 references / Add more references