Disagreements: Anscombe, Geach, Wittgenstein

Philosophical Investigations 38 (1-2):1-24 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My essay explains and examines Anscombe's disagreement with Wittgenstein about what the Tractatus supposedly excludes. I also discuss her apparent disagreement with Geach about propositions that lack an intelligible negation. My discussion of these disagreements leads to the topic of Anscombe on the relation between the “business of thinking” and truth. I suggest that she takes the business of thinking to include thinking that helps to keep thinking on track. Since there is a tie between thinking truly and the business of thinking being done well and since helping to keep thinking on track belongs to the business of thinking, helpings-of-thinking can be described as true.

Other Versions

reprint Diamond, Cora (2019) "Disagreements: Anscombe, Geach, Wittgenstein". In Diamond, Cora, Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, going on to ethics, pp. 202-230: Harvard University Press (2019)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-25

Downloads
158 (#264,837)

6 months
8 (#1,324,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cora Diamond
University of Virginia

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1963 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Ethics with Aristotle.Sarah Broadie - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Culture and Value.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1980 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press. Edited by G. H. von Wright & Heikki Nyman.
Philosophical remarks.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1975 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Rush Rhees.

View all 40 references / Add more references