Moral Enhancement Can Kill

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (5):568-584 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is recent empirical evidence that personal identity is constituted by one’s moral traits. If true, this poses a problem for those who advocate for moral enhancement, or the manipulation of a person’s moral traits through pharmaceutical or other biological means. Specifically, if moral enhancement manipulates a person’s moral traits, and those moral traits constitute personal identity, then it is possible that moral enhancement could alter a person’s identity. I go a step further and argue that under the right conditions, moral enhancement can constitute murder. I then argue that these conditions are not remote.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-05

Downloads
1,896 (#17,203)

6 months
326 (#20,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Parker Crutchfield
Western Michigan University School Of Medicine

Citations of this work

Mental Privacy, Cognitive Liberty, and Hog-tying.Parker Crutchfield - 2024 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 21 (4):695-710.
Virtue Theory for Moral Enhancement.Joao Fabiano - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2):89-102.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.

View all 31 references / Add more references