The unjustified-suffering argument for vegetarianism

Abstract

A major argument for vegetarianism is that eating animals causes unjustified suffering. While this argument has been articulated by several people, it has received surprisingly little attention. Here I restate it in a way that I believe is most convincing, considering and rejecting the two main justifications for causing suffering in order to eat animals. I compare it to some other prominent arguments for vegetarianism, and discuss a major objection to the argument which focuses on whether the animals would not exist if not bred to be eaten.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Food fight! Davis versus Regan on the ethics of eating beef.Andy Lamey - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2):331–348.
The Vegetarian Savage.David Boonin-Vail - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):75-84.
A modest proposal.Richard Hanley - 2004 - Public Affairs Quarterly 18 (1):1-12.
The unjustified-suffering argument for vegetarianism.Simon R. Clarke - 2009 - In Raymond Aaron Younis, On the ethical life. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 57-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#1,419,107)

6 months
38 (#223,150)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references