Abstract

This paper examines the structural conditions under which identity persistence through change can be coherently defined. Rather than making empirical or metaphysical claims, it asks what must be true for the distinction between “same” and “not the same” to be meaningful, non-arbitrary, and non-trivial across transformation. From these minimal requirements, a sequence of constraints is derived, including invariance under admissible re-description, bounded drift, and non-branching continuation. These constraints force identity persistence into a specific structural form characterized by a one-dimensional recurrent domain, invariant representation, and scalar ordering. The resulting framework shows that, within the defined regime, identity persistence admits a unique scalar form (up to positive affine transformation). The analysis is explicitly non-ontological and is intended as a structural contribution to the study of persistence, identity, and invariance.