Forces

Philosophy of Science 55 (4):614-630 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Traditionally, forces are causes of a special sort. Forces have been conceived to be the direct or immediate causes of things. Other sorts of causes act indirectly by producing forces which are transmitted in various ways to produce various effects. However, forces are supposed to act directly without the mediation of anything else. But forces, so conceived, appear to be occult. They are mysterious, because we have no clear conception of what they are, as opposed to what they are postulated to do; and they seem to be hidden from direct observations. There is, therefore, strong initial motivation for trying to eliminate forces from physics. Furthermore, as we shall explain, powerful arguments can be mounted to show that theories with forces can always be recast as theories without them. Hence it seems that forces should be eliminated, in the interests of simplicity. We argue, however, that forces should not be eliminated--just differently construed. For the effect of elimination is to leave us without any adequate account of the causal relationships forces were postulated to explain. And this would remain the case, even if forces could be identified with some merely dispositional properties of physical systems. In our view, forces are species of the causal relation itself, and as such have a different ontological status from the sorts of entities normally considered to be related as causes to effects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Deflationist Solution to the Problem of Forces.Sophie Roux - 2018 - In Delphine Antoine-Mahut & Sophie Roux, Physics and Metaphysics in Descartes and in His Reception. New York: Routledge. pp. 141-159.
Evolutionary and Newtonian Forces.Christopher Hitchcock & Joel D. Velasco - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1:39-77.
The Composition of Forces.Olivier Massin - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (3):805-846.
Economic Forces of Oppression.Ann E. Cudd - 2006 - In Analyzing Oppression. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 119-154.
Primitive and Derivative Forces.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1999 - In Robert Merrihew Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York, US: OUP Usa. pp. 378-400.
Newtonian Forces.Jessica Wilson - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (2):173-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
534 (#102,618)

6 months
57 (#156,154)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Bigelow
Monash University

Citations of this work

Essays on Deleuze.Daniel Smith - 2012 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
The rise and fall of british emergentism.Brian P. Mclaughlin - 1992 - In Ansgar Beckermann, Hans Flohr & Jaegwon Kim, Emergence or Reduction?: Prospects for Nonreductive Physicalism. New York: De Gruyter. pp. 49-93.
Are Symmetry Principles Meta-laws?Shelly Yiran Shi - 2025 - Synthese 205 (223):1-21.

View all 242 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Three theses about dispositions.Elizabeth W. Prior, Robert Pargetter & Frank Jackson - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (3):251-257.
Causation and the flow of energy.David Fair - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (3):219 - 250.
Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?Nancy Cartwright - 1980 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (1-2):75-84.
Causal explanation and the reality of natural component forces.Lewis G. Creary - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (2):148-157.

View all 10 references / Add more references