Cognitive impenetrability, phenomenology, and nonconceptual content

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):367-368 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary discusses Pylyshyn's model of perceptual processing in the light of the philosophical distinction between the conceptual and the nonconceptual content of perception. Pylyshyn's processing distinction maps onto an important distinction in the phenomenology of visual perception.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Cognitive penetration and nonconceptual content.Fiona Macpherson - 2015 - In John Zeimbekis & Athanassios Raftopoulos, The Cognitive Penetrability of Perception: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 330-358.
The Distinction between Conceptual and Nonconceptual Content.Jose Bermudez - 2007 - In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Two Kinds of Explanation and Their Significance.Christopher Peacocke - 2024 - In Ori Beck & Miloš Vuletić, Empirical Reason and Sensory Experience. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 157-179.
Phenomenology and nonconceptual content.Christopher Peacocke - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):609-615.
Seeing beyond the modules toward the subject of perception.Alva Noë & Evan Thompson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):386-387.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
182 (#222,969)

6 months
25 (#404,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jose Luis Bermudez
Texas A&M University

Citations of this work

Modular architectures and informational encapsulation: A dilemma.Dustin Stokes & Vincent Bergeron - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):315-38.
[no title].Dustin Stokes, Mohan Matthen & Stephen Biggs (eds.) - 2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references