Recruitment Processes in Academia: Does the Emperor Have Any Clothes?

Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1565-1568 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The final outcome of promotion and recruitment processes in universities should be conventional and plausible by the members of the relevant scientific community, to affirm that the processes have been competitive and fair. The objective of this opinion letter is to make a plea for the importance of the post-auditing and quantitative assessment of the selection criteria. It is shown that for an example case the outcome of the post-audit does not look reasonable from an external point of view, at least regarding the research competency.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Recruitment and Role of Lay Members.Dr Giles Legood - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):135-138.
Investigating ethical issues in engineering design.Ibo Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.
Investigating ethical issues in engineering design.Ibo van de Poel - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):429-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-24

Downloads
71 (#831,936)

6 months
11 (#1,080,318)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references