Concept attribution in nonhuman animals: Theoretical and methodological problems in ascribing complex mental processes

Philosophy of Science 58 (2):221-240 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The demise of behaviorism has made ethologists more willing to ascribe mental states to animals. However, a methodology that can avoid the charge of excessive anthropomorphism is needed. We describe a series of experiments that could help determine whether the behavior of nonhuman animals towards dead conspecifics is concept mediated. These experiments form the basis of a general point. The behavior of some animals is clearly guided by complex mental processes. The techniques developed by comparative psychologists and behavioral ecologists are able to provide us with the tools to critically evaluate hypotheses concerning the continuity between human minds and animal minds.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
344 (#133,008)

6 months
62 (#149,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin Allen
University of California, Santa Barbara

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.

View all 12 references / Add more references