Two Major Probabilistic Theories of Evidence

In The book of evidence. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 44-68 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two standard probabilistic theories of evidence are introduced: increase‐in‐probability (positive relevance) and high‐probability. These theories must be augmented by some definition of probability if a full theory of evidence is to be formulated and evaluated. Four popular theories of probability are presented: Carnap's _a priori_ theory, the frequency theory, the propensity theory, and the subjective theory. It is shown how each yields a different concept of evidence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objective Epistemic Probability.Peter Achinstein - 2001 - In The book of evidence. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 95-113.
Probability.Antony Eagle - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys, The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 417-439.
Towards an Epistemic Theory of Probabilistic Causality.Scott Devito - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
The Book of Evidence.Stathis Psillos - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):740-743.
Heterodox Probability Theory.Peter Forrest - 2007 - In Dale Jacquette, A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 582–594.
Discussion note: Positive relevance defended.Sherrilyn Roush† - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (1):110-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
1 (#2,387,721)

6 months
1 (#2,186,395)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Achinstein
Johns Hopkins University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references