Individual edits:
NAME
allocated for Romain Malécot
Discussion
Fri Jul 10
15:09
Robert C. Lyons: Link format not correct.
COMMENTS
Then, every term a_i of L is inserting one by one in the resulting list in position k, such as (k - 1)/i <= a_i < k/i.
COMMENTS
Let L = [a_1, a_2, …, a_n] be a list of size n of real numbers in [0, 1[.
The n-th Gaston's second-class number a(n) is the number of iterations of the Gaston's algorithm required for every n-sized list is either sorted or never becomes sorted.
Discussion
Fri Jul 10
15:14
Michel Marcus: please make a correct link
Discussion
Fri Jul 10
17:05
Sean A. Irvine: Same problem
LINKS
https://tfjm.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/index.pdf
Discussion
Sat Jul 11
02:57
Romain Malécot: Why has the unkn keyword been removed? I had added it because almost nothing is known about this sequence (except the first terms).
COMMENTS
Gaston's algorithm was introduced in the eight problem of the 2026 edition of the TFJM² (French Tournament of Young Mathematicians) (see links).
COMMENTS
Gaston's algorithm was introduced in the eighth problem of the 2026 edition of the TFJM² (French Tournament of Young Mathematicians) (see links).
Discussion
Tue Jul 14
15:42
Sean A. Irvine: Did you read the definition of the "unkn" keyword? It was correctly removed.
LINKS
TFJM², <a href="https://tfjm.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/index.pdf">Problèmes du 16ème Tournoi Français des Jeunes Mathématiciennes et Mathématiciens</a>, version 2, Jan 08 2026, p. 10.
Discussion
Wed Jul 15
13:24
Hugo Pfoertner: I have the same questions here that I also asked in the discussion about A397806.
Discussion
Wed Jul 22
18:50
OEIS Server: This sequence has not been edited or commented on for a week
yet is not proposed for review. If it is ready for review, please
visit https://oeis.org/draft/A397807 and click the button that reads
"These changes are ready for review by an OEIS Editor."
Thanks.
- The OEIS Server
All edits since published version (omitting small deletions for readability):
NAME
allocated for Romain Malécot
Discussion
Fri Jul 10
15:09
Robert C. Lyons: Link format not correct.
15:14
Michel Marcus: please make a correct link
17:05
Sean A. Irvine: Same problem
Sat Jul 11
02:57
Romain Malécot: Why has the unkn keyword been removed? I had added it because almost nothing is known about this sequence (except the first terms).
Tue Jul 14
15:42
Sean A. Irvine: Did you read the definition of the "unkn" keyword? It was correctly removed.
Wed Jul 15
13:24
Hugo Pfoertner: I have the same questions here that I also asked in the discussion about A397806.
Wed Jul 22
18:50
OEIS Server: This sequence has not been edited or commented on for a week
yet is not proposed for review. If it is ready for review, please
visit https://oeis.org/draft/A397807 and click the button that reads
"These changes are ready for review by an OEIS Editor."
Thanks.
- The OEIS Server