Re: Proposal: Integrating DAAP Functionality into QUIC

Edward Aylward <aylward.edward@gmail.com> Mon, 14 July 2025 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <aylward.edward@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: quic@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CE143F37CE; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYsYIPSzGC00; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2922A43F37BD; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ae0df6f5758so805615766b.0; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1752516272; x=1753121072; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k/u5Kbb0QFY9b+0uMXAOarljjT4zgAB4dvah92LniuI=; b=eBUW6KvTCWWd8xlVynXzZbQF0M/nHxkRnsg2XNb3Aof1Sl3wozsuqHHjJztaUDLVv5 x5Ptta/wUDDEvBkC5ZBOE5Cyl48idY/8Ux7gSkPWQABKpzKMSzeLLuwSCESBvbvUFJDk m2JP8l2/nN+yTkAcWKi8mgPfdKfvDUKoe2p4eiRaw40jFVowgXfhgBgF7gfkesCSkQwo kzZIuvdsQDHyPyFcXKD77bIT7v9l6GMOZlul/DcnzTC0Ugp+wG3FS2ko6/F9YdjQbmlB /MoYNRgjCSSKQCk5qJYpv8WvhjoSKOebHCiDy6kLnGFmsVm0Y+NCJvWrVFqPemAMInFx LskA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1752516272; x=1753121072; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=k/u5Kbb0QFY9b+0uMXAOarljjT4zgAB4dvah92LniuI=; b=ooItIdJ/rCbjR7SoOyOPuQMgcbYQwOdCTcW1MV2uxhWAr73FSHeATKIjZAnh0MIgno y/OSUSMGpSwjFkjYmptyxtSAfBdWPozoPOUaAlzcurN/XJvQQNXtcrOCevOVZVaiDssN 5eQv7xPA6zWhk0eAHcLyVgaqWgXiyJ68vQNL3BM7Df1N3tm/F29NtVVgwHb4uf61h1qH nc0jFqDsxJps3jfeWkuFSy2fhsPYbYCCtv0yWyCSGY7SB4Z1Rlut7nhblbxPA/5zrWmF drNQQTEd+nqKOAQ84f61Dnx524rvOzti4OnpnsG+FE6Po7nkRb2sV6L3b9YwxscdJWNU owKw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV1ehlAzEHiLCpGXtbZ5PRdc7XozoHetYK/Y1n66FZe/LtlJx0jxGI+y5dGSdiYkOWqtTVzCw==@ietf.org, AJvYcCVsApu5fwiQZ8AmksTu0EgS4TVKcpLvy0Cyr9JMQyZjKFa2VWaugxgYy/QA59iS50u/TobrNyj3P1h6iQ==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxiaGTQ6afJUeWgO5jbucXP0LJbDHfMjST1nXLeooT4A9873dpE AzRXY6NeheuAFgnUt+7gf4S994mEK6x5I3GUfsnvx9WbDPk27tirn3vTyymI514gmXjb1P6zKn1 EJY0t08v8lyxCfXbFpSTKSfsNaGKZfJw=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctM29Xi/L+QmKiLqDLbte+uOMwjcK8HBRg0LFCU6/FNeXfghOaVxQu0cJy0cpu Q/SvGGTVVoFv1neKkEwzRyw0SwaOkh6kiDtXEfenyH/wAWjS62JWJ5kJ1I8HNUnC8ONWOIBxZOS v4cNi+D9zfayZobbyvFd5MXALu4SjjN1XmeozCx9ZJ+7l6qjC/LagbQmU99QbUQhXWoaaNvF7SE 2H17/vqmMke/VNa7sCmnQHn7/2nTrS0xISPR635
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFbg/cfAntaxkyMZGuFTgTbE63k5Vine0uX3SjXVRhs6S4ZkEQgSmCoweEiy1vl6GoQ3EJsEgPwyrMc8JGD4QQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b08:b0:ae1:f1e3:ccea with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ae6fbf40993mr1518938766b.7.1752516271731; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL6-Gb-dC9OesKtXSYkB4C0U0Zb9A6gm_1gFXdG6uHOfx7RZCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOYVs2qbqKT8o3xeDn0HMC2sD2TwgSNp-swmMppJE5EJw-oY9w@mail.gmail.com> <11f7334f-56cb-40d2-bf1b-1f1682abb182@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <11f7334f-56cb-40d2-bf1b-1f1682abb182@app.fastmail.com>
From: Edward Aylward <aylward.edward@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:03:53 -0700
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXwPMS2867B8iCyp-klWFoIqGNLfgCxPIkPDAYpwpgArxXbe5s22PNqdrZg
Message-ID: <CAL6-Gb9xhkvGjcT0tWLb5N71S6Xe_M43adw1hba4QzkD+0JUYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Integrating DAAP Functionality into QUIC
To: Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6fbba0639e77d1f"
Message-ID-Hash: MXWPE6LZQIHLNR3R53KC3TB62HTJXXPX
X-Message-ID-Hash: MXWPE6LZQIHLNR3R53KC3TB62HTJXXPX
X-MailFrom: aylward.edward@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>, QUIC WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>, quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/rfbF3_IU3a-DdsStsO9BcxLiM-o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>

Thank you both for the clarification

          Respectfully,

*          Edward R. Aylward II          *702.533.9112


On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 7:19 PM Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com> wrote:

> Hi Edward
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025, at 16:48, Marten Seemann wrote:
>
> It’s difficult to provide meaningful feedback without access to the draft
> itself, but my initial question would be: what’s the justification for
> defining new QUIC frame types? In general, QUIC frames, aside from STREAM
> and DATAGRAM, are intended to modify transport-layer behavior. Based on the
> description, DAAP appears to be an application-layer protocol, and it seems
> more appropriate for it to be layered on top of QUIC rather than extending
> the transport itself.
>
> +1 Marten's points
>
> Generally, embedding non-transport capabilities into the transport layer
> is an anti-pattern. Furthermore, there is no common QUIC API, which makes
> exposing transport features that applications rely on a difficult task.
>
> I'd first encourage you to explore some options for running your protocol
> over HTTP/3 or WebTransport. Both of which run over QUIC and provide clear
> explanations of how QUIC streams or datagrams can be used to exchange
> application protocol data. Then you might get a clearer idea what, if any,
> inefficiences you see.
>
> Cheers
> Lucas
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 16:44, Edward Aylward <aylward.edward@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> *Subject:* Proposal: Integrating DAAP Functionality into QUIC
>
> *To:* quic-chairs@ietf.org
> *Cc:* quic@ietf.org
> *From:* Ed Aylward aylward.edward@gmail.com
> *Date:* July 11, 2025
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Dear Lucas and Matt,
>
> I hope you’re both doing well.
>
> My name is Ed Aylward, and I’m the author of *draft-aylward-daap-v2*,
> which outlines the Distributed AI Accountability Protocol (DAAP). It’s a
> framework designed to help maintain human oversight over autonomous AI systems
> by requiring regular, verifiable communication with a designated authority.
>
> I’m reaching out to propose a new QUIC extension that would allow DAAP to
> run natively over QUIC. The goal is to move beyond HTTP-over-TCP, embedding
> DAAP’s core functions directly into the transport layer by defining:
>
>    -
>
>    New QUIC frame types for behavioral check-ins, policy updates, and
>    emergency signaling
>    -
>
>    A TLS extension (daap_identity) to establish agent identity at the
>    start of the QUIC handshake
>    -
>
>    Multiplexed streams to handle real-time control, telemetry, and
>    enforcement in parallel
>
> This integration would provide tighter security guarantees, better
> performance, and more responsive control, especially valuable for
> environments where speed, reliability, and accountability are critical.
>
> If the working group is open to reviewing this idea, either as a
> contribution to QUIC or as an individual draft submission, I’d be happy
> to share:
>
>    -
>
>    A working draft in the IETF format
>    -
>
>    Notes on how the implementation maps to current QUIC capabilities
>    -
>
>    Example use cases in sectors like robotics, edge AI, and smart
>    infrastructure
>
> Thanks for considering this. I appreciate your time and would welcome any
> suggestions or guidance on next steps.
>
> Best regards,
> *Edward Richard Aylward, Jr.*
> Email: aylward.edward@gmail.com
> DAAP GitHub: https://github.com/ELF-GUARD/DAAP/
> ORCID: 0000-0003-0313-6993
>
>
>