Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action ...
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sat, 15 June 2024 06:06 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F51CC180B58 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJrlNh1rBhm8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB42C169431 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 23:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F2C1140311; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:06:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:06:46 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1718431606; x=1718518006; bh=ntfITgblDEMpJnRtONqMMVhgVFYT J4lGuWEGeHucSNQ=; b=HvxSL4FG/xxRkNZu/b7IyXdTJWdidljx5xx9GH7wLcfK qqHNHNZHxRwzkej+rZXxutDDiiwh5dUfpvc1EidaBFAVvmRqNCKM+MylGAjQmFFR xUwo3TlUR6B8CFSB/MQGb4g06a08NQ1jHTEKbGMp4TtXU7aIGa6Xq6FSqsW96JuS NhlUb6DqRWIivoTVveXHEiC0wbKTKtOKPbHSrxnHotMhjfS6GuANBPOZPdzFa1ov L/UrLS3C9ba26twXlKkQ9dDpxLycsv4Yg35z8wmqzYRUxdIy4J/MbJdwOezjfTOT u6XmYXX8pMaFc72K9lG3b9CQy2kEDcs+jU6LsdS2zQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:di9tZuYof0HpZJS_Jtgj91uCk52PQI1fNB_qWtrtyXX6R803_ZY3AA> <xme:di9tZhYq4ZFbDAxcP52vKprR9CLlpbfrDsnuP1F4V59NwMP8wPMnBMjpeefl6tXbd V4Ujc2vME86NA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:di9tZo8HV0CqUe2pEnXAAaq48snMGo1EU8WUnUviAjgYMX1TDVZ6tG9P0tVWe6--mktjD6EbeQowUefM5zL2rXavesLNI3uoqI6l6g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfedvtddguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjsegrtderredtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghi thhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtoh hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejvdfhtdduhedugfekteeikeetfeefhefgueetgfdv hfehvefghfeijedvtdevueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:di9tZgoekNRRLHNmHlZbXAC8292lGG8moPSzDcha2ZnFvWrWEkNx9Q> <xmx:di9tZpqK1ZWWFaH39pPCga2kSus4T77zM_G3p0V9shDUygjlPzjXuA> <xmx:di9tZuT7UHnc3dmQyevgYLCH6uBpRgMm-LJhghdeJC21mRk_0g5oGA> <xmx:di9tZpqpl8qrGKITotgHdZc0-apPyVfmCb4P63nXJ2TUl82uR2dzFw> <xmx:di9tZg2RqVzl8g7A7UdB3j377OwJD2wLgaJKpwtwSfKcJQ_qsQsbdXc1>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:06:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------FyutTpcmw5GRoxhfZtMiPh2c"
Message-ID: <57c5fff0-9da5-4078-b85a-07abd339e5f1@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:06:45 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action ...
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <171785763936.33553.13380053453419884540@ietfa.amsl.com> <905faa73-62c0-4bbf-91ad-72851aad373f@network-heretics.com> <cf029d2f-930f-9911-336b-855bd42e57d3@nostrum.com> <d9243563-86cd-484a-86e8-37199378895e@network-heretics.com> <4e73573f-96e9-44a6-9a19-845e1046bf9d@gmail.com> <4e7e7f26-6775-4d71-9b77-afe7c5daee92@network-heretics.com> <139ee308-6480-68f3-306d-210693f4cc61@nostrum.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <139ee308-6480-68f3-306d-210693f4cc61@nostrum.com>
Message-ID-Hash: LJWVAEBIUF3APM33XETFWRCCOKBYHQ7M
X-Message-ID-Hash: LJWVAEBIUF3APM33XETFWRCCOKBYHQ7M
X-MailFrom: moore@network-heretics.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SVY7Vh09JWMx8mYUudyStfnkZpE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
On 6/15/24 02:02, Adam Roach wrote: >> But I also don't think that a person so accused should have to answer >> for messages they've sent arbitrarily long ago. People can and >> sometimes do improve their behavior over time, for various reasons. > > > I agree that people can change, which is why BCP 83 reasonably > provides process for restoration of posting rights. ok and good, though that's different than using old messages to justify a new action. > If the messages you're referring to are the ad hominems I cited in my > initial message to this thread, I'll point out that one of them > occurred eight days before this PR Action last call was initiated, and > I don't believe that eight days is an egregiously long timeframe to > look back for a record that bears on "current behavior". (If your > concern regards the age of the other message I cited: I purposefully > chose a very recent and a very old message to demonstrate a > long-running and ongoing pattern.) I consider eight days sufficiently recent to be of potential relevance. (But I haven't tried to read that actual message and don't currently have an opinion about it.) I don't think two data points indicates a "long-running and ongoing pattern". Keith
- Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action ... Keith Moore
- Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action ... Adam Roach
- Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action ... Keith Moore