The term "dotless domain" usually refers to top-level domains (TLDs) – think com, gov, etc – that are reachable themselves using a web browser or email server.
That is, they are working domains that consist of a single label: http://com/, as opposed to http://example.com/; or contact@gov, as opposed to [email protected]. This can happen if the domain's DNS zone contains A/AAAA or MX records in its apex.[1]
Both the ICANN and the IAB are notoriously against the practice,[1][2] so ICANN prohibits it where it can – namely, on gTLDs.[3] However, DNS is decentralized, and ccTLDs (i.e. country code TLDs) fall largely under their own country's jurisdiction! As such, there currently are and historically have been examples of active dotless ccTLDs.
For email, the protocol itself would need to allow a dotless domain as a destination address. ICANN's SSAC argues that SMTP requires at least two labels (i.e. domain.tld) to deliver an email,[1] likely due to the following excerpts in the SMTP specification:
The domain name [...] is the entire, fully-qualified name. A domain name that is not in FQDN form is no more than a local alias. Local aliases MUST NOT appear in any SMTP transaction.
[...] Local nicknames or unqualified names MUST NOT be used.
However, dotless domains really are FQDN after all – as they include all labels required to uniquely identify the domain –, and the following clause can be argued to explicitely allow any dotless domains that have MX records:
[...] names that can be resolved to MX RRs [...] are permitted
Either way, it is unlikely Mauritania would receive an email sent to contact@mr, for example. For completeness' sake, however, apex MX servers are listed below as well.
Table of Contents:
# A or AAAA
# Current
These are TLDs that, as of the last check, contain apex A or AAAA records. Unless referenced, dates indicate an observation by me, directly.
| Territory | ccTLD | URL | IP (A/AAAA) |
Email server (MX) |
Status | First seen on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | .bd | http://bd/ | 203.112.194.232 | No |
|
Mar. 2025 |
| Cameroon | .cm | http://cm/ | 195.24.205.60 | No |
|
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Tokelau (NZ) | .tk | http://tk/ | 217.119.57.22 | No |
|
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Uzbekistan | .uz | https://uz/ | 91.212.89.8 | No |
|
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Samoa | .ws | http://ws/ | 64.70.19.33 | mail.worldsite.ws |
|
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
# Screenshots
(mirror of cctld.uz)
# New TLDs
In order to prevent local aliases from colliding with newly registered TLDs (think programmers using foo.bar as a test domain before the creation of the gTLD .bar), ICANN published a resolution in 2014 requiring new TLDs to include a few apex DNS records on their TLDs for at least 90 days.[4]
As such, the following TLDs also contain apex records, but they're merely informational and don't point to real servers:
| TLD | IP (A/AAAA) |
Email server (MX) |
Text record (TXT) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
.عرب (.xn--ngbrx) |
127.0.53.53 | your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.xn--ngbrx | "Your DNS configuration needs immediate attention see https://icann.org/namecollision" |
# Historical
These are TLDs that previously had apex records, but no longer do so. Some come from a list compiled by the IETF in 2013;[5] unless referenced, other dates indicate an observation by me, directly.
| Territory | ccTLD | URL | IP (A/AAAA) |
Email server (MX) |
Known working date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascension (UK) | .ac | http://ac/ | 193.223.78.210 | No |
Apr. 2009[hb]— Dec. 2013 |
| Anguilla (UK) | .ai | http://ai/ | 209.88.68.34 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
| Anguilla (UK) | .ai | http://ai/ | 209.59.119.34 | mail.offshore.ai |
Apr. 2009[hb]— Oct. 2024[at] |
| Burundi | .bi | http://bi/ | 196.2.8.205 | No |
Jan. 2007[dl]— Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Bahrain | .bh | http://bh/ | 88.201.27.211 10.10.10.10 |
No | Aug. 2021— Jan. 2022 |
| Cameroon | .cm | http://cm/ | 195.24.192.17 | ? |
Jan. 2007[dl]— Apr. 2009[hb] |
| Denmark | .dk | http://dk/ | 193.163.102.10 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
| Denmark | .dk | http://dk/ | 193.163.102.24 [2a01:630:0:40:b1a:b1a:2011:1] |
No |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Mar. 2016[at] |
| Guernsey (UK) | .gg | http://gg/ | 87.117.196.80 | No |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Dec. 2013 |
| Hong Kong (CN) | .hk | http://hk/ | 203.119.2.28 | No | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| British Indian Ocean Territory (UK) |
.io | http://io/ | 80.249.100.38 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
| British Indian Ocean Territory (UK) |
.io | http://io/ | 193.223.78.212 | mailer2.io |
Apr. 2009[hb]— Dec. 2013 |
| Isle of Man (UK) | .im | http://im/ | 217.23.168.132 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
| Jersey (UK) | .je | http://je/ | 87.117.196.80 | No |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Dec. 2013 |
| Cambodia | .kh | http://kh/ | 203.223.32.21 | ns1.dns.net.kh | Jul. 2013— Dec. 2013 |
| Mongolia | .mn | https://mn./ | 202.131.0.65 | ? | Apr. 2009[hb] |
| Mongolia | .мон (.xn--l1acc) |
https://мон./ |
180.149.98.234 202.131.4.60 218.100.84.27 |
No |
Aug. 2022[jw]— May 2025 |
| Philippines | .ph | http://ph/ | 203.119.4.7 | No |
Jan. 2007[dl]— Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Pitcairn Islands (UK) | .pn | http://pn/ |
80.68.93.100 139.162.17.173 |
No |
Jan. 2007[dl]— Aug. 2023 |
| Palau | .pw | http://pw/ | 203.199.114.33 | No |
Apr. 2009[hb]— Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Saint Helena (UK) | .sh | http://sh/ |
64.251.31.234 193.223.78.211 |
No |
Jan. 2007[dl]— Dec. 2013 |
| Turkmenistan | .tm | http://tm/ | 80.249.100.37 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
| Turkmenistan | .tm | http://tm/ | 193.223.78.213 | No |
Apr. 2009[hb]— Dec. 2013 |
| Tonga | .to | http://to/ |
216.74.32.103 216.74.32.107 |
No |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Jan. 2017[at] |
| Uzbekistan | .uz | http://uz/ | 195.158.1.25 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
| Vatican | .va | http://va/ | [2a01:b8:0:1:212:77:0:2] [2a01:b8:0:1:212:77:0:110] |
No | Aug. 2021— Jan. 2024 |
| Virgin Islands (US) | .vi | http://vi/ | 193.0.0.198 | No | Jul. 2013— Dec. 2013 |
| Samoa | .ws | http://ws/ | 63.101.245.10 | ? | Jan. 2007[dl] |
# Screenshots
(mirror of offshore.ai)
(Apache 2 Test Page)
# MX only
# Current
These are TLDs that, as of the last check, contain only MX apex records; that is, they could, in theory, send and receive email, but have no reachable website. Unreferenced dates indicate an observation by me, directly.
| Territory | ccTLD | Email server (MX) |
First seen on |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Samoa (US) | .as | no.mx.nic.as | Dec. 2025 |
| Central African Republic | .cf | mail.intnet.cf | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Djibouti | .dj |
smtp.intnet.dj relais2.intnet.dj |
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Dominica | .dm | mail.nic.dm | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Guadeloupe (FR) | .gp |
ns1.nic.gp ns34259.ovh.net manta.outremer.com |
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Guatemala | .gt |
mail.gt aspmx2.googlemail.com aspmx4.googlemail.com aspmx5.googlemail.com aspmx.l.google.com alt1.aspmx.l.google.com alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Croatia | .hr | alpha.carnet.hr | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Comoros | .km | mail1.comorestelecom.km | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Martinique (FR) | .mq | mx1-mq.mediaserv.net | Jun. 2010[sf2] |
| Mauritania | .mr | mail.nic.mr | Aug. 2021 |
| Mauritania |
.موريتانيا (.xn--mgbah1a3hjkrd) |
mail.nic.mr | May 2025 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | .tt | aspmx.l.google.com alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
Jul. 2013[5] |
| Ukraine | .ua | mr.kolo.net | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Vatican | .va | . | Sep. 2025 |
# Historical
Similarly to the historical A/AAAA records, these are TLDs that previously (only) had apex MX records, but no longer do so. Some come from a list compiled by the IETF in 2013;[5] other unreferenced dates indicate an observation by me, directly.
| Territory | ccTLD | Email server (MX) |
Known working date |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Samoa (US) | .as | dca.relay.gdns.net | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Åland Islands (FI) | .ax | mail.aland.net | Jul. 2013— Dec. 2013 |
| Benin | .bj | mail6.domain-mail.com | Jun. 2010[sf2] |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo |
.cd | mail.nic.CD | Jul. 2013— Aug. 2013 |
| Dominica | .dm | mail.nic.dm | Jul. 2013— Dec. 2013 |
| Cambodia | .kh | ns1.dns.net.kh |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Oct. 2022 |
| Sri Lanka | .lk | malithi-slt.nic.lk malithi-lc.nic.lk |
Jul. 2013— Jan. 2024 |
| Marshall Islands | .mh |
imap.pwke.twtelecom.net mx1.mail.twtelecom.net mx2.mail.twtelecom.net |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Jun. 2010[sf2] |
| Martinique (FR) | .mq | mx1-mq.mediaserv.net | Dec. 2009[sf1] |
| Niger | .ne |
bow.intnet.ne bow.rain.fr |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Jun. 2010[sf2] |
| Panama | .pa | ns.pa |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Jan. 2024 |
| Philippines | .ph | mx1.sendnow.ph mx2.sendnow.ph mx3.sendnow.ph mx4.sendnow.ph mx5.sendnow.ph |
Aug. 2021— Oct. 2022 |
| Suriname | .sr | spsbbank.sr | Aug. 2021— Jan. 2024 |
| Chad | .td | mail.intnet.td |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Jun. 2010[sf2] |
| Trinidad and Tobago | .tt |
66-27-54-138.san.rr.com 66-27-54-142.san.rr.com |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Jun. 2010[sf2] |
| Vatican | .va |
lists.vatican.va paul.vatican.va proxy2.urbe.it john.vatican.va raphaelmx1.posta.va raphaelmx2.posta.va raphaelmx3.posta.va |
Dec. 2009[sf1]— Dec. 2013 |
| Yemen | .ye | mail.yemen.net.ye |
Jun. 2010[sf2]— Dec. 2013 |
# Bonus: Dotless Dot?
Dotless domains work because top-level domains (TLDs) are just as much nodes in the DNS tree as second-level domains (SLDs), or any other level beneath them. That means there is no technicaly limitation to their DNS records, and they may contain A, AAAA and MX records.
Another, often forgotten node in the DNS tree is the root, represented by a single dot, .. It's the parent of all TLDs! Though it's usually omitted, every domain terminates with a dot: example.com is, in fact, example.com.; example is a child of com which, in turn, is a child of ..
Followed to its logical conclusion, this means the root domain could also contain A, AAAA and MX records! That is, accessing http://./ or emailing example@. is, at least in theory, possible.
Sadly, the odds of that ever happening are very nearly zero. The root doesn't have A, AAAA or MX records and likely won't, ever.