@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

ashleythorne

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

Thanks for your work! I have a question though. I just installed it and signed in and it authenticated via a browser link. That works for SSHing from a desktop, but the page mentions it being good "In environments where the graphical UI cannot be used". Is it planned to allow for entering a password and 2FA code when where there truly is no GUI available?

ashleythorne , (edited )
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

I don't like Brave's leadership or crypto, but the problem for me is that Brave ticks the most boxes

  • Adblocking
  • Privacy
  • Security
  • Multiplatform
  • Web Apps

There are browsers that do stuff better, like Vanadium and Trivalent, but those are locked to specific platforms, have poor built in ad blockers, and encourage you to never install extensions for security reasons.

And if I want to avoid the Chromium monopoly, there's Webkit which still manages to have good security and privacy, but there's no Webkit browser on Android and on Linux, Gnome Web feels slow to use and doesn't have a good adblocker.

That being said, I'm still on Firefox right now. Chromium has some weird quirks on the desktop that annoys me so much.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

I wouldn't consider using IronFox since, from what I hear, Firefox's security is worst on Android. Even Linux has better sandboxing than it. While I'm sure IronFox is better, I'm not sure how much better it can be.

As for Librewolf, I'm considering it. I've actually had it installed for maybe two years at this point but never really used it. It's nice that it removes the annoying popups from Firefox and lacks the crypto of Brave. And it should be more secure due to the hardening and disabling of features. And while the security and sandboxing isn't as strong as it is on Windows/MacOS or Chromium's, at least it should be better than standard Firefox.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

You can tinker for the most part, it's just done differently. In the Universal Blue world, that would be creating your own OCI container using their image template or blue build.

The nice thing is that it makes the OS much more reproducible than imperative commands and scripts.

ashleythorne OP ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

Not a security issue, copyright/license issues.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

The bar is meant to be very minimal and not distracting.

It takes up space, sure, but it's close to the minimal height while still having easily readable time up top

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

In my experience, many Gnome apps make doing complex tasks pretty easy compared to third party apps. However, it is at the cost of customization and questions like "why can't I do this???"

But in general, Gnome's simple design works for me, most things feel clean and polished. I don't need the vast majority of features offered.

In the cases where Gnome's default aren't powerful enough, often times the KDE equivalent isn't good enough for me either despite offering more features and customization.

As an example, Gnome Text Editor vs Kwrite and Kate. GTS has the basics I need like line numbers (Apple's text editor does not have this...) and that fits 80% of my needs. But what about more advanced things? Well, no markdown support but I don't think Kate has that either. What about coding? I'd rather use a dedicated IDE than Kate or GTS.

Most, if not all car companies collect and profile your data, how can I improve my privacy when buying a modern car? ( www.mozillafoundation.org )

I think car privacy isn't talked about amongst any privacy enthusiasts online ever, and it apparently is one of the biggest data collectors out there. For someone like me who values electric cars for there affordability and environmental reasons, but still want physical car buttons and control over my data, how would I go about ...

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

You can purchase used electric cars too.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

The truth is that Chromium is really good. It has the best security and performance.

Vanadium takes that and makes changes to make it more secure and private.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

That's valid.

That's also part of the reason I like Webkit. It's in a nice spot between Firefox and Chromium when it comes to security and performance. And importantly, is not from an ad company and often passes on browser specs that would be harmful to privacy and security.

I forget what the site is called, but I saw one that nicely layed out different browser specs and gives the explanation why one of the engine developers decided against supporting or implementing it.

I just wish there was a good Webkit browser on Linux. Unfortunately, Gnome Web just feels slow and unresponsive despite good benchmarks.

ashleythorne OP ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

I'm using the browser web page version, not extension. And it's not a case of waiting, it would be days or weeks after creating it that I would notice it's gone.

ashleythorne OP ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

Not a filter issue.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

You don't really need to check the checksum.

Also, if you're on Ubuntu, you can officially get the Proton apps from the Snap Store, no terminal necessary. And there's also unofficial repackages on Flathub.

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

I believe those warnings are old, I believe Proton recently begun maintaining those themselves. I read some sort of testimonial from Proton about how great the Snap Store is and blah blah blah, though I can't find the blog post for it.

The apps are from Proton AG on the Snap Store, which is a verified account. And the Proton Mail snap doesn't have that warning, while for some reason the other two still do.

Edit: found it https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/snapping-privacy-into-place-proton-s-gpl-powered-journey-with-ubuntu/67251

ashleythorne ,
@ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

No, it's a limitation with swaybg so they created a tool that doesn't have that limitation.

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • ashleythorne , (edited )
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    Sideloading or preinstalling?

    Sideloading already existed, but only for ostree flatpaks. Flatpak also supports OCI flatpaks, but the support for those aren't as good, hence the previously missing side loading support.

    ashleythorne ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    The for argument is basically the following

    • Wayland as a protocol was designed around CSDs, protocols for SSDs came years later
    • Having the client control the CSDs simplifiies things for the compositor and apps
      • The compositor has less things to implement and test
      • Modern apps tend to prefer CSDs anyway since it provides more flexibility, very common on MacOS and Windows
      • It's difficult to coordinate things between the client and compositor.
        • Something that annoys me about KDE is that they do this headerbar look where the top part of the application will match the color of the the titlebar. However, the top part of the application is drawn by the application and the titlebar is drawn by the compositor. But when the color changes (such as going from unfocused to focused), they do not update at the same time, so for a frame or few the top part of the application is a different color than the titlebar. That wouldn't happen under CSDs.
    ashleythorne ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    That can be dropped eventually too. Compositors like Niri don't implement Xwayland support directly, and instead use Xwayland Satellite.

    ashleythorne ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    “We do <thing > because we always did before <thing 2>” is not a good point

    I didn't mean it in a "this is better way". I'm just saying that Wayland was designed around the idea of client side decorations, not server side decorations. Gnome has stuck to the more purist vision of Wayland, which makes sense since I believe they were its biggest proponent.

    ashleythorne ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    No

    ashleythorne ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    [Blockchain] technology is neutral. People make it good or bad.

    Sure, maybe. But you're making it clear you're in the bad camp too when you're announcing this with NFTs.

    ashleythorne OP ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    I question their motives with Bedrock more than Java. Though there is some stuff like the chat censorship in Java that is questionable.

    ashleythorne OP ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    I hope the performance significantly improves by then. Beta 1 felt pretty rough to me. And also, animations.

    ashleythorne ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    It's not a Rust bug, it was a logic bug in uutils.

    ashleythorne OP ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    Unfortunate. Though I did find out that Minecraft can use Wayland natively, if you block its access to the X11 socket or don't have Xwayland installed.

    ashleythorne , (edited )
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    The main reason I hear is that it maximizes screen usage and helps avoid/limit the tediousness of having to manage windows.

    Not what you're asking for, but I'll give you my perspective as someone who's tried tiling on and off and overall don't like it.

    1. Applications work best at certain aspect ratios, having them automatically tiled to different aspect ratios can be annoying
    2. Some windows windows/pop-ups have no business being tiled. Like some Yes/No dialogs (not all windows specify a max size which would avoid triggering the tiling) or a simple calculator. And you can specify which ones to have floating, but it requires setup.
    3. Sometimes it ends of causing more work than floating environements. Most of the time I only have a max of 2 windows open, but occasionally I'll quickly try to do something then end up with 4-5 windows, at which point that's too many windows and I need to reorganize stuff to continue working. But that usually wouldn't be an issue in a floating environment.
    4. Worst of all, just setting up a tiling environment is a nightmare. You have to configure the actual compositor/WM, which tools you want to use with it (bar, launcher, screenshot tool, notifications, screenlocker, etc) and configure all those too, ideally with some basic theming to make them look coherent. But inevitably you end up with missing functionality especially in the modern area where an app might be sandboxed or expecting all xdg-portals to be implemented, which most compositors don't do.

    Cosmic is exciting in this regard since it aims to be a fully-featured floating and tiling environment. You could just toggle between them as necessary (or have them on separate workplaces). You also get much better portal support.

    ashleythorne OP ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    I ran 1.21.10 and snapshot 25w34a. With xeyes, I was able to confirm that 1.21.10 was using Xwayland and 25w34a was using Wayland.

    ashleythorne OP , (edited )
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    You could run the game under Wayland before, but it was not default behavior nor provided as an option.

    I used to force the game to use the Wayland version 3 years ago to work around a bug in GLFW that caused inputs to be ignored under X11.

    But then Minecraft updated to use a fixed version of GLFW so I stopped needing to do so.

    ashleythorne OP ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    Not sure why Lemmy sometimes does that with the preview, here is the link: https://blogs.gnome.org/gtk/2025/10/23/svg-in-gtk/

    ashleythorne OP ,
    @ashleythorne@lemmy.world avatar

    Oh wow, I missed that! That's great.