Table 11 Comparison of SHAP and RF feature selection methods in terms of their AUPRC scores
From: Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods
Size | SHAP-RF | RF | p-value | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 0.8097 | 0.8137 | 0.5673 | Tie |
5 | 0.8396 | 0.8248 | 0.0133 | Tie |
7 | 0.8416 | 0.8382 | 0.6126 | Tie |
10 | 0.8447 | 0.8479 | 0.6399 | Tie |
15 | 0.8544 | 0.8512 | 0.6693 | Tie |