Table 10 Comparison of SHAP and ET feature selection methods in terms of their AUPRC scores
From: Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods
Size | SHAP-ET | ET | p-value | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 0.7796 | 0.7843 | 0.6756 | Tie |
5 | 0.8172 | 0.8118 | 0.4243 | Tie |
7 | 0.8143 | 0.8137 | 0.9179 | Tie |
10 | 0.8175 | 0.8168 | 0.9152 | Tie |
15 | 0.8086 | 0.8048 | 0.7238 | Tie |