Cuban revolutionaries, including Fidel Castro (far left) and Che Guevara (center), in Havana in 1960.
On this day in 1959, U.S.-backed Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista fled the country following the victory of Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement (M-26-7) at the Battle of Santa Clara, marking the successful conclusion of the Cuban Revolution.
The 26th of July Movement takes its name from the date of with a failed attack on the Moncada Barracks in 1953, however, the movement bearing this name was not formally organized until the attackers were released from prison in 1955. Public resistance continued sporadically until November 1956, when 80 members of the M-26-7 returned from exile.
Soon after landing on the island, a separate revolutionary group, the "Directorio Revoluncionari Estudiantil" (DRE), unsuccessfully attempted an attack on the Presidential Palace in Havana.
Throughout 1957, armed resistance from groups such as the DRE and M-26-7 would escalate. After a failed offensive by the government against rebels in the summer of 1958, the rebels launched a major counter-offensive.
On December 28th, 1958, after a fraudulent election in favor of Batista, revolutionary forces reached the city of Santa Clara. Seizing equipment from an armored train intended to transport government reinforcements, the rebels quickly captured the city, prompting Batista to panic and flee to the Dominican Republic with a personal fortune of more than $300 million.
In the following days, revolutionary forces entered Havana with no resistance, and Castro established a provisional government. The 26th of July Movement later reformed along Marxist–Leninist lines, becoming the Communist Party of Cuba in October 1965.
Batista later settled in fascist Spain, dying there in 1973 at the age of 72.
-
Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War by Ernesto "Ché" Guevara
-
To the U.N. General Assembly, The Problem of Cuba and its Revolutionary Policy by Fidel Castro
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- 🐻Link to all Hexbear comms https://hexbear.net/post/1403966
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube](https://live.hexbear.net/c/movies
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread https://hexbear.net/post/6697187
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread https://hexbear.net/post/6904909
- 🏳️⚧️ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread https://hexbear.net/post/6979368
- 👊 New Weekly Improvement thread https://hexbear.net/post/6980340
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread https://hexbear.net/post/6902391
- ☕ Parenting Chat https://hexbear.net/post/6969163
- 🐉 Anime & Manga discussion thread https://hexbear.net/post/6887856
- 🎩Fashion megathread https://hexbear.net/post/6995397
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:


Some interesting answers about hexbear from Deepseek(the only AI i touch)
what is hexbear
spoiler
Hexbear is a leftist, primarily Marxist-Leninist, online community and link aggregator website. It's often described as a more radical alternative to platforms like Reddit, but with a specific ideological focus.
Here’s a breakdown of its key characteristics:
Core Identity & Ideology
Platform & Structure
:hexbear:) used on the site, which is a pixelated bear face inside a hexagon.Culture and Reputation
In Summary:
Think of Hexbear as a politically homogeneous, ideologically strict, and community-moderated forum for far-left (mainly Marxist-Leninist) discussion. It was born from a banned Reddit community seeking a permanent, independent home. It's not a platform for debate with liberals or conservatives but rather a space for like-minded radicals to share news, analysis, and organize within their specific political framework.
Important Note: Descriptions of Hexbear vary greatly depending on the political perspective of the source. Mainstream outlets and right-wing critics often portray it as a toxic extremist haven, while its users see it as a necessary safe haven from what they view as liberal or reactionary platforms.
write an example post in the style of hexbear user
spoiler
POST TITLE: just witnessed the most libshit interaction imaginable at the whole foods bulk bins
COMMUNITY: chapotraphouse2 (pinned) TAGS: #anticapitalism #late stage capitalism #praxis posting
so i'm just trying to get some goddamn lentils o7 and i overhear two PMC types in patagonia vests having the most terminal conversation.
one goes: "i'm just so disillusioned with both parties, you know? we need a viable third way."
the other, sipping a $9 kombucha, nods sagely: "totally. it's why i'm donating to yang's forward party. we need data-driven human-centered capitalism."
i literally almost dropped my reusable produce bag. a "third way" between two right-wing capitalist parties. "human-centered" capitalism. they've fully internalized the aesthetics of critique while demanding the preservation of the very machinery that's killing the planet and immiserating us all. the sheer ideological capture. the poverty of imagination that can only envision a different brand manager for the same death cult.
anyway i finished getting my lentils. stay safe out there bears, the ideological superstructure is thick today.
:hexbear: :sickle: :hammer: o7
COMMENTS (12):
user: dot hexbear dot net
user: a name
user: a name
user: a name
user: a name
user: a name
user: a name
STYLE NOTES & EXPLANATION:
:hexbear:custom emoji and classic socialist emojis (:sickle: :hammer:).dot hexbear dot net lol
I dont know how to describe it exactly, but there really is something so fundamentally inorganic about the way LLMs produce dialogue. It always resorts to every ChatGPT-ism and cliche under the sun
Like, even the way every generated comment looks too structurally "perfect" and leaves no room for unique human error or quirks. It's almost annoying to look at at times
Pretty sure they're explicitly instructed to format their responses like that because its believed to be the most helpful. Quickest to skim.
Probably also trained on a horde of university papers graded on how they match that format.
The Axios-iffication of the web
deleted by creator
so true bestie
Uncanny
Estimated demographics of hexbear users(from further on in the same 'conversation' parts of which I've omitted here):
spoiler
Estimating the demographics of Hexbear is necessarily speculative, as the site does not release official statistics, but we can construct a reasoned profile based on its origins, observable culture, ideological positioning, and comparisons to similar online leftist spaces.
Core Demographic Profile (Estimated)
1. Age
2. Gender
3. Geography & Nationality
4. Education & Class
5. Ethnicity/Race
6. Employment & Status
Ideological & Cultural Demographics (The "Factions")
This is as important as standard demographics on Hexbear:
Key Limitations of This Estimate
Summary: The Typical Hexbear User (Stereotype)
A 28-year-old white male American with a university degree in humanities or social sciences, working in a precarious or tech-adjacent job, who identifies as a Marxist-Leninist, spends significant time online, is versed in theory, deeply anti-liberal, and uses niche humor as a social bonding mechanism. However, the site contains meaningful diversity outside this stereotype, particularly in gender identity and political tendency, all unified by a committed, anti-capitalist, and anti-imperialist stance.
Analogy: If Twitter leftism is the broad church, and leftist subreddits are the denominational schools, Hexbear is the insular, rigorous seminary for a particular strand of revolutionary thought—and its demographics reflect that of seminarians: highly committed, studious, and demographically narrower than the flock they aim to lead.
deleted by creator