In-App Purchase (StoreKit) integration for iOS App Store
Hi, I'm building an iOS app with Base44 and it got rejected by Apple because of Guideline 3.1.1 — they require In-App Purchase (StoreKit) instead of Stripe for digital content. Do you have a native StoreKit / In-App Purchase integration planned? If so, when will it be available?
Evan “Agence Éternel” About 2 hours ago
Feature Request
In-App Purchase (StoreKit) integration for iOS App Store
Hi, I'm building an iOS app with Base44 and it got rejected by Apple because of Guideline 3.1.1 — they require In-App Purchase (StoreKit) instead of Stripe for digital content. Do you have a native StoreKit / In-App Purchase integration planned? If so, when will it be available?
Evan “Agence Éternel” About 2 hours ago
Feature Request
Superagent All-App Mode?
Descrição: O Superagent já consegue ler dados de outros apps do mesmo dono via read_user_app_data, mas não pode escrever (criar, atualizar ou deletar registros). Isso quebra qualquer automação end-to-end. O que pedimos: um "All-App Mode" onde o dono do app autoriza o Superagent a ter acesso completo (leitura + escrita) em todos os seus apps — sem precisar de endpoints customizados ou intervenção manual. Caso real: tenho diversos apps e 4 apps (Business Oportunize, GAP 2.0, BasketTeam Pro, meotenisold). Meu Superagent conhece todo o meu negócio mas fica de mãos amarradas na hora de agir. Com acesso completo, ele poderia executar fluxos inteiros de automação autonomamente. Seria o diferencial real do Superagent como agente verdadeiramente autônomo. 🙏 — Hugo Arens, CEO Oportunize Gestão e Negócios
oportunize oportunize About 2 hours ago
Feature Request
Superagent All-App Mode?
Descrição: O Superagent já consegue ler dados de outros apps do mesmo dono via read_user_app_data, mas não pode escrever (criar, atualizar ou deletar registros). Isso quebra qualquer automação end-to-end. O que pedimos: um "All-App Mode" onde o dono do app autoriza o Superagent a ter acesso completo (leitura + escrita) em todos os seus apps — sem precisar de endpoints customizados ou intervenção manual. Caso real: tenho diversos apps e 4 apps (Business Oportunize, GAP 2.0, BasketTeam Pro, meotenisold). Meu Superagent conhece todo o meu negócio mas fica de mãos amarradas na hora de agir. Com acesso completo, ele poderia executar fluxos inteiros de automação autonomamente. Seria o diferencial real do Superagent como agente verdadeiramente autônomo. 🙏 — Hugo Arens, CEO Oportunize Gestão e Negócios
oportunize oportunize About 2 hours ago
Feature Request
Superagent All-App Mode?
👋 Tenho diversos projetos e 4 apps na plataforma (Business Oportunize, GAP 2.0, BasketTeam Pro e meotenisold) e meu Superagent já conhece profundamente o meu negócio — contexto, clientes, estratégia. O desafio é exatamente esse: ele lê tudo, entende tudo, mas na hora de agir nos outros apps, trava. É como ter um assistente genial de mãos amarradas. Com o write_user_app_data funcionando entre apps do mesmo dono, o Superagent poderia: Implementar melhorias de código nos meus apps automaticamente Criar e atualizar registros cross-app sem intervenção manual Executar fluxos completos de automação end-to-end Hoje 90% do caminho é autônomo — esse 10% final quebra tudo. Seria o diferencial real do Superagent como agente verdadeiramente autônomo. 🙏 — Hugo Arens, CEO Oportunize Gestão e Negócios
oportunize oportunize About 3 hours ago
Feature Request
Superagent All-App Mode?
👋 Tenho diversos projetos e 4 apps na plataforma (Business Oportunize, GAP 2.0, BasketTeam Pro e meotenisold) e meu Superagent já conhece profundamente o meu negócio — contexto, clientes, estratégia. O desafio é exatamente esse: ele lê tudo, entende tudo, mas na hora de agir nos outros apps, trava. É como ter um assistente genial de mãos amarradas. Com o write_user_app_data funcionando entre apps do mesmo dono, o Superagent poderia: Implementar melhorias de código nos meus apps automaticamente Criar e atualizar registros cross-app sem intervenção manual Executar fluxos completos de automação end-to-end Hoje 90% do caminho é autônomo — esse 10% final quebra tudo. Seria o diferencial real do Superagent como agente verdadeiramente autônomo. 🙏 — Hugo Arens, CEO Oportunize Gestão e Negócios
oportunize oportunize About 3 hours ago
Feature Request
Missing Disconnecting Whatsapp from Superagents feature
It does sound like the ability to disconnect WhatsApp from a Superagent isn't available in the UI yet. I linked my Superagent to Whatsapp using the Activation code as requested but when I searched to disconnect it, I could not find any option to do so. Could you please investigate this ? Do not hesitate to reach me if you want me to show you live if it is unclear 😎 Thank you very much for your time and help, I wish you a wonderful afternoon. Kind regards.
Pierre Moras About 5 hours ago
Feature Request
Missing Disconnecting Whatsapp from Superagents feature
It does sound like the ability to disconnect WhatsApp from a Superagent isn't available in the UI yet. I linked my Superagent to Whatsapp using the Activation code as requested but when I searched to disconnect it, I could not find any option to do so. Could you please investigate this ? Do not hesitate to reach me if you want me to show you live if it is unclear 😎 Thank you very much for your time and help, I wish you a wonderful afternoon. Kind regards.
Pierre Moras About 5 hours ago
Feature Request
Allow the purchase of batch credits when plan is used up.
I just ran out of credits under my plan. In order to get more credits, I have to upgrade to the next level (on top of what I currently pay) or wait for the month to end. We should be able to buy separate batches of credits without having to upgrade the plan. 50 credits = $30 extra 250 credits = $50 extra 500 credits = $75 extra or something like this, so we’re not stuck having to upgrade or wait 2 weeks, which is not an option for some people when under time lines.
Jason Myers About 6 hours ago
Feature Request
Allow the purchase of batch credits when plan is used up.
I just ran out of credits under my plan. In order to get more credits, I have to upgrade to the next level (on top of what I currently pay) or wait for the month to end. We should be able to buy separate batches of credits without having to upgrade the plan. 50 credits = $30 extra 250 credits = $50 extra 500 credits = $75 extra or something like this, so we’re not stuck having to upgrade or wait 2 weeks, which is not an option for some people when under time lines.
Jason Myers About 6 hours ago
Feature Request
server accept typescript, but editor he doesn't accept it
If there is a syntax error in the editor the file is not deployed to the server
Francesco About 9 hours ago
Feature Request
server accept typescript, but editor he doesn't accept it
If there is a syntax error in the editor the file is not deployed to the server
Francesco About 9 hours ago
Feature Request
Feature Request: Cross-App Write Access for Superagents
The SuperAgents are great. Really a step forward. Great work. A Superagent can currently read data from other apps owned by the same user via read_user_app_data, but cannot write to them (create, update, or delete entity records). This means that tasks which could otherwise be fully automated still require manual intervention for the final step. Proposed solution Add a section in each app's Settings called something like "Connected Superagents", where the app owner can select which Superagent(s) are allowed to write to that app. The connected agent would then receive admin-level access to that app's entities — the same way it already works for the agent's own app. Why not a custom endpoint? A custom endpoint (e.g. via a Function) only partially solves the problem: You'd need to build a separate endpoint for every action → high maintenance The agent doesn't learn the app's data structure or logic Internal automations and business logic in the app wouldn't be triggered Direct entity access is cleaner, more powerful, and consistent with how the platform already works. Concrete use case My Superagent receives an email with an attachment → retrieves and uploads the file → needs to add it as a document to the correct grant application in my GrantWise app → and mark the related task as done. Right now, 90% of this is automated but it breaks at the write step. Suggested implementation Add a connected_agents field to app configuration When an agent request comes in with a matching agent ID → grant admin-level entity access Expose a write_user_app_data tool alongside the existing read_user_app_data This seems relatively straightforward to implement and would unlock true end-to-end automation across apps — which I think is a compelling use case for any power user on the platform. Thanks for considering it!
ET4ever About 11 hours ago
Feature Request
Feature Request: Cross-App Write Access for Superagents
The SuperAgents are great. Really a step forward. Great work. A Superagent can currently read data from other apps owned by the same user via read_user_app_data, but cannot write to them (create, update, or delete entity records). This means that tasks which could otherwise be fully automated still require manual intervention for the final step. Proposed solution Add a section in each app's Settings called something like "Connected Superagents", where the app owner can select which Superagent(s) are allowed to write to that app. The connected agent would then receive admin-level access to that app's entities — the same way it already works for the agent's own app. Why not a custom endpoint? A custom endpoint (e.g. via a Function) only partially solves the problem: You'd need to build a separate endpoint for every action → high maintenance The agent doesn't learn the app's data structure or logic Internal automations and business logic in the app wouldn't be triggered Direct entity access is cleaner, more powerful, and consistent with how the platform already works. Concrete use case My Superagent receives an email with an attachment → retrieves and uploads the file → needs to add it as a document to the correct grant application in my GrantWise app → and mark the related task as done. Right now, 90% of this is automated but it breaks at the write step. Suggested implementation Add a connected_agents field to app configuration When an agent request comes in with a matching agent ID → grant admin-level entity access Expose a write_user_app_data tool alongside the existing read_user_app_data This seems relatively straightforward to implement and would unlock true end-to-end automation across apps — which I think is a compelling use case for any power user on the platform. Thanks for considering it!
ET4ever About 11 hours ago
Feature Request
Image output changed to 1024x1024 on march 10th. Destroyed my website
This is unbelievable. Base44 changed the system of rendering the image base44.integrations.Core.GenerateImage to have only squared images! If it is not reverted this change totally destroy 3 months of work, my website and the monthly fee I take from customers. If this change to the core is keep I only have to refund the customers and loose 3 month of 3 people works. Now only choice is start again with a stable platform and loose 5 month to rebuild it. Advise: cannot base a project on an instable platform that change the core without back-compatibility
disarci About 12 hours ago
Feature Request
Image output changed to 1024x1024 on march 10th. Destroyed my website
This is unbelievable. Base44 changed the system of rendering the image base44.integrations.Core.GenerateImage to have only squared images! If it is not reverted this change totally destroy 3 months of work, my website and the monthly fee I take from customers. If this change to the core is keep I only have to refund the customers and loose 3 month of 3 people works. Now only choice is start again with a stable platform and loose 5 month to rebuild it. Advise: cannot base a project on an instable platform that change the core without back-compatibility
disarci About 12 hours ago
Feature Request
Multi sites & each have their own domain
It would be nice if one of your premium plan would have a feature supporting Multi sites custom front end & each have their own domain on the same backend. Everything hosted by you of course 😉 Ex: a soccer league with many teams
Francois Cloutier About 17 hours ago
Feature Request
Multi sites & each have their own domain
It would be nice if one of your premium plan would have a feature supporting Multi sites custom front end & each have their own domain on the same backend. Everything hosted by you of course 😉 Ex: a soccer league with many teams
Francois Cloutier About 17 hours ago
Feature Request
if i enter a chat and its not what i want and i click on the revert button, the company should change their terms to allow users to gain their credit points back, not money but credit points. that would help user so much in creating their apps
Eunice Grace About 19 hours ago
Feature Request
if i enter a chat and its not what i want and i click on the revert button, the company should change their terms to allow users to gain their credit points back, not money but credit points. that would help user so much in creating their apps
Eunice Grace About 19 hours ago
Feature Request
StoreKit/IAP Integration for Apple and Google to sell digital and have subscriptions. You don’t need it. Use stripe!!!! This is HUGE.
payment + review flow Legal background (Epic v. Apple) Case: Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20‑cv‑05640‑YGR (N.D. Cal.). Result: Apple cannot block or punish apps for sending users to an external website (like Stripe) to pay instead of using Apple’s in‑app purchase system, for US App Store users. Apps are allowed to: • Show prices and “subscription” language inside the app. • Redirect users to a web page for payment (e.g., Stripe Checkout). • Return users to the app afterwards. How this works with Base44 + Stripe The app itself is built in Base44 (web app wrapped for iOS/Android). Inside the app you: • Show subscription options and pricing. • When the user taps “Subscribe,” show a clear message like: “You are leaving the app to complete payment on our secure website (Stripe).” • Then redirect them to a Stripe Checkout URL in the browser / in‑app web view. • After payment, Stripe redirects back to a URL or deep link that re‑opens the app with the user marked as subscribed. Because the payment is processed on the web via Stripe, Apple and Google do NOT take the 15–30% cut; you just pay normal Stripe fees. What we do in practice Build everything in Base44 (RealShield AI app). Integrate Stripe for subscriptions. Implement a “leaving the app to pay on the web via Stripe” confirmation box before redirect. Submit the wrapped app to: • Google Play (AAB file). • Apple App Store (IPA file). If Apple rejects the app Sometimes reviewers still apply old rules and say you “must use in‑app purchases.” In that case, we DO NOT change the payment flow. Instead, we appeal. In the appeal, we: • Cite Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20‑cv‑05640‑YGR. • Explain that: – The app uses a clearly disclosed external web payment (Stripe). – Users see a neutral notice that they are leaving the app to pay on the web. – No Apple IAP is being used or hidden; the flow is consistent with the court decision and Apple’s updated US rules. Typical pattern: Submit with Stripe + external redirect notice. If Apple approves: done. If Apple rejects on payments: file an appeal referencing the Epic case and clarify that this is an allowed external payment flow. Short version: Epic v. Apple opened the door for external web payments (Stripe) in US apps. A Base44 app can show prices and subscriptions, then send users to Stripe on the web and back. If Apple says “no,” you appeal and point to the Epic ruling instead of rebuilding the app or ripping Stripe out. I have also consulted with my lawyer and he confirms this. Im working out a few bugs on my app and turning into Apple and Google today. I’ll post on here what happens, if it gets approved or rejected.
Israel Mudder About 22 hours ago
Feature Request
StoreKit/IAP Integration for Apple and Google to sell digital and have subscriptions. You don’t need it. Use stripe!!!! This is HUGE.
payment + review flow Legal background (Epic v. Apple) Case: Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20‑cv‑05640‑YGR (N.D. Cal.). Result: Apple cannot block or punish apps for sending users to an external website (like Stripe) to pay instead of using Apple’s in‑app purchase system, for US App Store users. Apps are allowed to: • Show prices and “subscription” language inside the app. • Redirect users to a web page for payment (e.g., Stripe Checkout). • Return users to the app afterwards. How this works with Base44 + Stripe The app itself is built in Base44 (web app wrapped for iOS/Android). Inside the app you: • Show subscription options and pricing. • When the user taps “Subscribe,” show a clear message like: “You are leaving the app to complete payment on our secure website (Stripe).” • Then redirect them to a Stripe Checkout URL in the browser / in‑app web view. • After payment, Stripe redirects back to a URL or deep link that re‑opens the app with the user marked as subscribed. Because the payment is processed on the web via Stripe, Apple and Google do NOT take the 15–30% cut; you just pay normal Stripe fees. What we do in practice Build everything in Base44 (RealShield AI app). Integrate Stripe for subscriptions. Implement a “leaving the app to pay on the web via Stripe” confirmation box before redirect. Submit the wrapped app to: • Google Play (AAB file). • Apple App Store (IPA file). If Apple rejects the app Sometimes reviewers still apply old rules and say you “must use in‑app purchases.” In that case, we DO NOT change the payment flow. Instead, we appeal. In the appeal, we: • Cite Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 4:20‑cv‑05640‑YGR. • Explain that: – The app uses a clearly disclosed external web payment (Stripe). – Users see a neutral notice that they are leaving the app to pay on the web. – No Apple IAP is being used or hidden; the flow is consistent with the court decision and Apple’s updated US rules. Typical pattern: Submit with Stripe + external redirect notice. If Apple approves: done. If Apple rejects on payments: file an appeal referencing the Epic case and clarify that this is an allowed external payment flow. Short version: Epic v. Apple opened the door for external web payments (Stripe) in US apps. A Base44 app can show prices and subscriptions, then send users to Stripe on the web and back. If Apple says “no,” you appeal and point to the Epic ruling instead of rebuilding the app or ripping Stripe out. I have also consulted with my lawyer and he confirms this. Im working out a few bugs on my app and turning into Apple and Google today. I’ll post on here what happens, if it gets approved or rejected.
Israel Mudder About 22 hours ago
Feature Request
Allow deferring /User/me auth check on public pages
"Allow deferring /User/me auth check on public pages so it doesn't appear in the critical rendering chain and affect LCP scores"
healthiermindforlife About 24 hours ago
Feature Request
Allow deferring /User/me auth check on public pages
"Allow deferring /User/me auth check on public pages so it doesn't appear in the critical rendering chain and affect LCP scores"
healthiermindforlife About 24 hours ago
Feature Request
Hello, There should be a way to add **partial additional credits**, regardless of the current plan, without needing to upgrade or change the plan. This limitation makes it harder to manage projects. Sometimes we only need to add a small amount of credits to continue working. Thank you for your attention.
Ronaldo Franco 1 day ago
Feature Request
Hello, There should be a way to add **partial additional credits**, regardless of the current plan, without needing to upgrade or change the plan. This limitation makes it harder to manage projects. Sometimes we only need to add a small amount of credits to continue working. Thank you for your attention.
Ronaldo Franco 1 day ago
Feature Request
I want my users to be able to see their password. I asked your help for it, got this response:In the AI chat, type something like: "Add a show/hide password toggle (eye icon) to the login and sign-up password fields so users can reveal their password while typing." The AI will update the password input fields to include a visibility toggle button. This is a standard UX feature and won't affect how passwords are stored or secured — it just lets users see what they're typing.
but that doesn’t work because it’s a feature from base 44 that the ai can’t manage.
Richard Stockwell 1 day ago
Feature Request
I want my users to be able to see their password. I asked your help for it, got this response:In the AI chat, type something like: "Add a show/hide password toggle (eye icon) to the login and sign-up password fields so users can reveal their password while typing." The AI will update the password input fields to include a visibility toggle button. This is a standard UX feature and won't affect how passwords are stored or secured — it just lets users see what they're typing.
but that doesn’t work because it’s a feature from base 44 that the ai can’t manage.
Richard Stockwell 1 day ago
Feature Request
New Features
The new superagent is truly incredible. Could we: add the possibility of changing the whatsapp name (and maybe even the profile picture)? what you currently see is “base44’s ai agent” but id love to be able to see my superagent’s name as i named her could you integrate superagent to phone alarms? im a heavy sleeper and having the superagent keep my phone alarm going until i’ve sent it a pic on whatsapp would be a life saver (i know there are similar clocks out there but they still have some sort of off button if you dont’ wanna get out of bed, which is exactly what i click everytime)
Yasmyna Feraru 1 day ago
Feature Request
New Features
The new superagent is truly incredible. Could we: add the possibility of changing the whatsapp name (and maybe even the profile picture)? what you currently see is “base44’s ai agent” but id love to be able to see my superagent’s name as i named her could you integrate superagent to phone alarms? im a heavy sleeper and having the superagent keep my phone alarm going until i’ve sent it a pic on whatsapp would be a life saver (i know there are similar clocks out there but they still have some sort of off button if you dont’ wanna get out of bed, which is exactly what i click everytime)
Yasmyna Feraru 1 day ago
Feature Request
I don't think it's right to deduct credits when the AI is correcting code errors. The right thing to do is that if you tell the AI to build something, it should do so correctly and functionally. I purchased the plan yesterday, and today I no longer have credits to continue working because the AI used them up trying to correct a code error, and the issue wasn't even resolved. Now I have to wait a month to be able to resolve it. It's unfair.
HACIENDA EFICIENTE 1 day ago
Feature Request
I don't think it's right to deduct credits when the AI is correcting code errors. The right thing to do is that if you tell the AI to build something, it should do so correctly and functionally. I purchased the plan yesterday, and today I no longer have credits to continue working because the AI used them up trying to correct a code error, and the issue wasn't even resolved. Now I have to wait a month to be able to resolve it. It's unfair.
HACIENDA EFICIENTE 1 day ago
Feature Request