Under Review
It seems that some (ab)users use their VPN to circumnavigate their bans.
I would like to suggest banning their network cards mac addresses.
This has to be implemented server-side, obviously.
and yes, it's not a fail save, but still, it would create more of an obstacle, not everyone knows how to spoof their address.
I would like to suggest banning their network cards mac addresses.
This has to be implemented server-side, obviously.
and yes, it's not a fail save, but still, it would create more of an obstacle, not everyone knows how to spoof their address.
Under Review
On the TV Series page, using multiple filters of the same type (e.g. genre) will add them as AND conditions and return series that match all of them so selecting Action and Comedy will only return action-comedies. There should be an option to change the condition to OR to enable this to return all shows tagged as either action or comedy.
Under Review
Under Review
Report torrent is rendering on top of the drop down when you click the pull down under your user id.
steps to reproduce: go to a torrent, scrunch your window enough so that when you click your user id to get the pull down, report torrent will be on top of the pull down.
steps to reproduce: go to a torrent, scrunch your window enough so that when you click your user id to get the pull down, report torrent will be on top of the pull down.
I think it'd be useful to have the ability to follow other users and an option to get a notification when they upload a new torrent
Thanks
Thanks
Under Review
Is there a way to stop torrent narcs from operating on EXT, I'm getting a large number of copyright infringement complaints from my ISP.
Under Review
Too many indian content showing up on the homepage and search results. An option to block them all will be pleasent.
Under Review
Here is a suggestion, why don't you shutdown all the losers who are filling this site with torrents loaded with viruses, when i first found this site it was good, but it has really gone down hill since then.
Under Review
It would be really nice if either the uploader puts on CAM if it is a CAM upload or perhaps the admin can create a CAM category. Every once in a while we get a good cam but mostly they are not. Personally, I would wait until a real upload if I knew it was a CAM
Under Review
Chat section? or at least a way to ask questions?
These are all 4k:
3840 x 2080 (1440p/QHD)
3832 x 2076 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1608 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1600 (1440p/QHD)
2876 x 2156
These are all 1080p
1920 x 1040 (720p/HD)
1920 x 960 (720p/HD)
1920 x 872 (720p/HD)
1920 x 804 (720p/HD)
1440 x 1080
16:9 calcs
If the frame is 3840 wide it is 4k
stop processing
If the frame is 1920 wide is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 calcs
if the frame is 2160 high it is 4k
stop processing
if the frame is 1080 high is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 4k
2880 × 2160 is also 4k
4:3 1080p
1440 × 1080
Here is some fuzzy logic:
3840 x 2080 (1440p/QHD)
3832 x 2076 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1608 (1440p/QHD)
3840 x 1600 (1440p/QHD)
2876 x 2156
These are all 1080p
1920 x 1040 (720p/HD)
1920 x 960 (720p/HD)
1920 x 872 (720p/HD)
1920 x 804 (720p/HD)
1440 x 1080
16:9 calcs
If the frame is 3840 wide it is 4k
stop processing
If the frame is 1920 wide is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 calcs
if the frame is 2160 high it is 4k
stop processing
if the frame is 1080 high is 1080p
stop processing
4:3 4k
2880 × 2160 is also 4k
4:3 1080p
1440 × 1080
Here is some fuzzy logic:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse
def classify_resolution(width, height):
"""
Classify video resolution as 4K, 1080p, 720p, or 480p.
Args:
width: Video width in pixels
height: Video height in pixels
Returns:
str: Resolution classification
"""
# 16:9 calculations (width-based)
if width == 3840:
return "4K"
if width == 1920:
return "1080p"
if width == 1280:
return "720p"
if width == 854 or width == 848 or width == 720:
return "480p"
# 4:3 calculations (height-based)
if height == 2160:
return "4K"
if height == 1080:
return "1080p"
if height == 720:
return "720p"
if height == 480:
return "480p"
# Fallback: classify by approximate pixel count
total_pixels = width * height
if total_pixels >= 8_000_000: # ~4K threshold (3840x2160 = 8,294,400)
return "4K"
elif total_pixels >= 1_400_000: # ~1080p threshold (midpoint between 720p and 1080p)
return "1080p"
elif total_pixels >= 600_000: # ~720p threshold (midpoint between 480p and 720p)
return "720p"
elif total_pixels >= 300_000: # ~480p threshold
return "480p"
else:
return "Unknown (below 480p)"
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description='Classify video resolution',
formatter_class=argparse.ArgumentDefaultsHelpFormatter
)
parser.add_argument('-w', '--width', type=int, required=True,
help='Video width in pixels')
parser.add_argument('-t', '--height', type=int, required=True,
help='Video height in pixels')
args = parser.parse_args()
resolution = classify_resolution(args.width, args.height)
print(f"{args.width} x {args.height} is classified as: {resolution}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Under Review
Hey! How about adding a Request Section separately so that comments section under every post looks clean!
Just like browse/search section
Try to separate Movies Request Section and TV Request Section separately!
Also Filtering options like Language,Year,Genre can be included so that the request meets the intended uploaders!
Just like browse/search section
Try to separate Movies Request Section and TV Request Section separately!
Also Filtering options like Language,Year,Genre can be included so that the request meets the intended uploaders!
Under Review
Can I get a default sort option in my profile settings? I want to default to sort by Age, newest to oldest. Seems to be sorting by seeds at the moment. I don't care about that.
Under Review
be able to quicky look at your Letterboxd watchlist and see if there are torrents and easily download it
Ability to press up and down with the arrows to swich between alternatives when you type your search and get multiple results (before you press the search button/enter).
Under Review
I would like to see some server stats. Logins, registered, online, guests, etc
I feel this site is growing exponentially over the last months.
It would be nice to see the growing activity and give a positive vibe.
I feel this site is growing exponentially over the last months.
It would be nice to see the growing activity and give a positive vibe.
Under Review
I would like to see a staff picks column, similar to how TorrentGalaxy did, just a nicety feature, collection of top torrents for when the trending tv and movie pages are slow.
Hey! Sometimes it's frustrating to know that there is no seed for a file even after we consciously selecting files with seeders! This is because they are total available seeds available for that file and not the actual live seed available for that file!
So if possible can you add the live time seed count so that we can select files that shall be downloaded rather than waiting for files with no available seeds to complete download!
If not how about adding an option to ask for reseeding option for such files so that no unwanted spamming around comment section of that file/any other file be achieved!
Do consider this!
So if possible can you add the live time seed count so that we can select files that shall be downloaded rather than waiting for files with no available seeds to complete download!
If not how about adding an option to ask for reseeding option for such files so that no unwanted spamming around comment section of that file/any other file be achieved!
Do consider this!
Under Review
Can you clarify how downloads are calculated? Is it only based on if you click the download torrent button, or does it include clicks on magnet links?
Lately quite a few incorrect torrents are being listed as complete seasons when in fact they are single episodes.
I would suggest checking type against size in order to flag these.
For example: Hijack Season 2 has ep's 4 to 8 lit up as having torrents (even though these episodes have not screened yet).
In fact, these are all "1. Hijack.S02.E01.Signal.1080p.ATVP.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264.TEEFA" listed as 3.3GB which I would suggest is a bit small for 8 x 1080p H.264 torrents.
The identical torrent is also in S01, S02 and S03 pages as "additional" 1080p listings.
So, for some reason the file has been scraped as a single episode but has been duplicated as a complete season of all 8 files.
Maybe it would be practical to check any whole season torrents that were smaller than, maybe - Season ep# x 500Mb? OR File count < Season Ep total?
Just a thought.
Thanks for all the great work!
Cheers
Col
I would suggest checking type against size in order to flag these.
For example: Hijack Season 2 has ep's 4 to 8 lit up as having torrents (even though these episodes have not screened yet).
In fact, these are all "1. Hijack.S02.E01.Signal.1080p.ATVP.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264.TEEFA" listed as 3.3GB which I would suggest is a bit small for 8 x 1080p H.264 torrents.
The identical torrent is also in S01, S02 and S03 pages as "additional" 1080p listings.
So, for some reason the file has been scraped as a single episode but has been duplicated as a complete season of all 8 files.
Maybe it would be practical to check any whole season torrents that were smaller than, maybe - Season ep# x 500Mb? OR File count < Season Ep total?
Just a thought.
Thanks for all the great work!
Cheers
Col
Showing 20 of 116 suggestions
Latest News
Latest Searches
Sites In Our Index
Suggestion Box
Share your ideas to help improve our community