Library and Extension FAQ¶
General Library Questions¶
How do I find a module or application to perform task X?¶
Check the Library Reference to see if there’s a relevant standard library module. (Eventually you’ll learn what’s in the standard library and will be able to skip this step.)
For third-party packages, search the Python Package Index or try Google or another web search engine. Searching for “Python” plus a keyword or two for your topic of interest will usually find something helpful.
Where is the math.py (socket.py, regex.py, etc.) source file?¶
If you can’t find a source file for a module it may be a built-in or
dynamically loaded module implemented in C, C++ or other compiled language.
In this case you may not have the source file or it may be something like
mathmodule.c
, somewhere in a C source directory (not on the Python Path).
There are (at least) three kinds of modules in Python:
modules written in Python (.py);
modules written in C and dynamically loaded (.dll, .pyd, .so, .sl, etc);
modules written in C and linked with the interpreter; to get a list of these, type:
import sys print(sys.builtin_module_names)
How do I make a Python script executable on Unix?¶
You need to do two things: the script file’s mode must be executable and the
first line must begin with #!
followed by the path of the Python
interpreter.
The first is done by executing chmod +x scriptfile
or perhaps chmod 755
scriptfile
.
The second can be done in a number of ways. The most straightforward way is to write
#!/usr/local/bin/python
as the very first line of your file, using the pathname for where the Python interpreter is installed on your platform.
If you would like the script to be independent of where the Python interpreter
lives, you can use the env program. Almost all Unix variants support
the following, assuming the Python interpreter is in a directory on the user’s
PATH
:
#!/usr/bin/env python
Don’t do this for CGI scripts. The PATH
variable for CGI scripts is
often very minimal, so you need to use the actual absolute pathname of the
interpreter.
Occasionally, a user’s environment is so full that the /usr/bin/env program fails; or there’s no env program at all. In that case, you can try the following hack (due to Alex Rezinsky):
#! /bin/sh
""":"
exec python $0 ${1+"$@"}
"""
The minor disadvantage is that this defines the script’s __doc__ string. However, you can fix that by adding
__doc__ = """...Whatever..."""
Is there a curses/termcap package for Python?¶
For Unix variants: The standard Python source distribution comes with a curses module in the Modules subdirectory, though it’s not compiled by default. (Note that this is not available in the Windows distribution – there is no curses module for Windows.)
The curses
module supports basic curses features as well as many additional
functions from ncurses and SYSV curses such as colour, alternative character set
support, pads, and mouse support. This means the module isn’t compatible with
operating systems that only have BSD curses, but there don’t seem to be any
currently maintained OSes that fall into this category.
Is there an equivalent to C’s onexit() in Python?¶
The atexit
module provides a register function that is similar to C’s
onexit()
.
Why don’t my signal handlers work?¶
The most common problem is that the signal handler is declared with the wrong argument list. It is called as
handler(signum, frame)
so it should be declared with two parameters:
def handler(signum, frame):
...
Common tasks¶
How do I test a Python program or component?¶
Python comes with two testing frameworks. The doctest
module finds
examples in the docstrings for a module and runs them, comparing the output with
the expected output given in the docstring.
The unittest
module is a fancier testing framework modelled on Java and
Smalltalk testing frameworks.
To make testing easier, you should use good modular design in your program. Your program should have almost all functionality encapsulated in either functions or class methods – and this sometimes has the surprising and delightful effect of making the program run faster (because local variable accesses are faster than global accesses). Furthermore the program should avoid depending on mutating global variables, since this makes testing much more difficult to do.
The “global main logic” of your program may be as simple as
if __name__ == "__main__":
main_logic()
at the bottom of the main module of your program.
Once your program is organized as a tractable collection of function and class behaviours, you should write test functions that exercise the behaviours. A test suite that automates a sequence of tests can be associated with each module. This sounds like a lot of work, but since Python is so terse and flexible it’s surprisingly easy. You can make coding much more pleasant and fun by writing your test functions in parallel with the “production code”, since this makes it easy to find bugs and even design flaws earlier.
“Support modules” that are not intended to be the main module of a program may include a self-test of the module.
if __name__ == "__main__":
self_test()
Even programs that interact with complex external interfaces may be tested when the external interfaces are unavailable by using “fake” interfaces implemented in Python.
How do I create documentation from doc strings?¶
The pydoc
module can create HTML from the doc strings in your Python
source code. An alternative for creating API documentation purely from
docstrings is epydoc. Sphinx can also include docstring content.
How do I get a single keypress at a time?¶
For Unix variants there are several solutions. It’s straightforward to do this using curses, but curses is a fairly large module to learn.
Threads¶
How do I program using threads?¶
Be sure to use the threading
module and not the _thread
module.
The threading
module builds convenient abstractions on top of the
low-level primitives provided by the _thread
module.
None of my threads seem to run: why?¶
As soon as the main thread exits, all threads are killed. Your main thread is running too quickly, giving the threads no time to do any work.
A simple fix is to add a sleep to the end of the program that’s long enough for all the threads to finish:
import threading, time
def thread_task(name, n):
for i in range(n):
print(name, i)
for i in range(10):
T = threading.Thread(target=thread_task, args=(str(i), i))
T.start()
time.sleep(10) # <---------------------------!
But now (on many platforms) the threads don’t run in parallel, but appear to run sequentially, one at a time! The reason is that the OS thread scheduler doesn’t start a new thread until the previous thread is blocked.
A simple fix is to add a tiny sleep to the start of the run function:
def thread_task(name, n):
time.sleep(0.001) # <--------------------!
for i in range(n):
print(name, i)
for i in range(10):
T = threading.Thread(target=thread_task, args=(str(i), i))
T.start()
time.sleep(10)
Instead of trying to guess a good delay value for time.sleep()
,
it’s better to use some kind of semaphore mechanism. One idea is to use the
queue
module to create a queue object, let each thread append a token to
the queue when it finishes, and let the main thread read as many tokens from the
queue as there are threads.
How do I parcel out work among a bunch of worker threads?¶
The easiest way is to use the concurrent.futures
module,
especially the ThreadPoolExecutor
class.
Or, if you want fine control over the dispatching algorithm, you can write
your own logic manually. Use the queue
module to create a queue
containing a list of jobs. The Queue
class maintains a
list of objects and has a .put(obj)
method that adds items to the queue and
a .get()
method to return them. The class will take care of the locking
necessary to ensure that each job is handed out exactly once.
Here’s a trivial example:
import threading, queue, time
# The worker thread gets jobs off the queue. When the queue is empty, it
# assumes there will be no more work and exits.
# (Realistically workers will run until terminated.)
def worker():
print('Running worker')
time.sleep(0.1)
while True:
try:
arg = q.get(block=False)
except queue.Empty:
print('Worker', threading.current_thread(), end=' ')
print('queue empty')
break
else:
print('Worker', threading.current_thread(), end=' ')
print('running with argument', arg)
time.sleep(0.5)
# Create queue
q = queue.Queue()
# Start a pool of 5 workers
for i in range(5):
t = threading.Thread(target=worker, name='worker %i' % (i+1))
t.start()
# Begin adding work to the queue
for i in range(50):
q.put(i)
# Give threads time to run
print('Main thread sleeping')
time.sleep(5)
When run, this will produce the following output:
Running worker
Running worker
Running worker
Running worker
Running worker
Main thread sleeping
Worker <Thread(worker 1, started 130283832797456)> running with argument 0
Worker <Thread(worker 2, started 130283824404752)> running with argument 1
Worker <Thread(worker 3, started 130283816012048)> running with argument 2
Worker <Thread(worker 4, started 130283807619344)> running with argument 3
Worker <Thread(worker 5, started 130283799226640)> running with argument 4
Worker <Thread(worker 1, started 130283832797456)> running with argument 5
...
Consult the module’s documentation for more details; the Queue
class provides a featureful interface.
What kinds of global value mutation are thread-safe?¶
A global interpreter lock (GIL) is used internally to ensure that only one
thread runs in the Python VM at a time. In general, Python offers to switch
among threads only between bytecode instructions; how frequently it switches can
be set via sys.setswitchinterval()
. Each bytecode instruction and
therefore all the C implementation code reached from each instruction is
therefore atomic from the point of view of a Python program.
In theory, this means an exact accounting requires an exact understanding of the PVM bytecode implementation. In practice, it means that operations on shared variables of built-in data types (ints, lists, dicts, etc) that “look atomic” really are.
For example, the following operations are all atomic (L, L1, L2 are lists, D, D1, D2 are dicts, x, y are objects, i, j are ints):
L.append(x)
L1.extend(L2)
x = L[i]
x = L.pop()
L1[i:j] = L2
L.sort()
x = y
x.field = y
D[x] = y
D1.update(D2)
D.keys()
These aren’t:
i = i+1
L.append(L[-1])
L[i] = L[j]
D[x] = D[x] + 1
Operations that replace other objects may invoke those other objects’
__del__()
method when their reference count reaches zero, and that can
affect things. This is especially true for the mass updates to dictionaries and
lists. When in doubt, use a mutex!
Can’t we get rid of the Global Interpreter Lock?¶
The global interpreter lock (GIL) is often seen as a hindrance to Python’s deployment on high-end multiprocessor server machines, because a multi-threaded Python program effectively only uses one CPU, due to the insistence that (almost) all Python code can only run while the GIL is held.
With the approval of