A YANG data model to manage configurable DWDM optical interfaces
draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14
Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (ccamp WG) | |
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Gabriele Galimberti , Dharini Hiremagalur , Gert Grammel , Roberto Manzotti , Dirk Breuer | ||
Last updated | 2025-10-20 | ||
Replaces | draft-dharini-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Yang Validation | 1 errors, 0 warnings | ||
Reviews | |||
Additional resources |
Yang catalog entry for ietf-ext-xponder-wdm-if@2020-03-09.yang
Yang impact analysis for draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang Mailing list discussion |
||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Associated WG milestone |
|
||
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14
Internet Engineering Task Force G. Galimberti, Ed. Internet-Draft Nokia Intended status: Standards Track D. Hiremagalur, Ed. Expires: 20 April 2026 G. Grammel, Ed. Juniper R. Manzotti, Ed. Cisco D. Breuer, Ed. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG 17 October 2025 A YANG data model to manage configurable DWDM optical interfaces draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 Abstract This memo defines a YANG model related to the Optical Transceiver parameters characterising coherent 100G and above interfaces. 100G and above Transceivers support coherent modulation, multiple modulation formats, multiple FEC codes including some not yet specified (or in phase of specification by) ITU-T G.698.2 or any other ITU-T recommendation. Use cases are described in RFC7698. The YANG model defined in this memo can be used for Optical Parameters monitoring and/or configuration of DWDM interfaces. The use of this model does not guarantee interworking of DWDM transceivers. Optical path feasibility and interoperability has to be determined by tools and algorithms outside the scope of this document. The purpose of this model is to program interface parameters to consistently configure the mode of operation of transceivers. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 1] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 April 2026. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2. Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.3. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. Module Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2. YANG Module Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3. Optical Parameters Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.4. Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3. WDM Interface YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Appendix B. Open Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Appendix C. YANG Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Appendix D. Applicability examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 2] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 1. Introduction This memo defines a YANG model for managing single channel optical interface parameters of coherent interfaces supporting DWDM applications, using the approach specified in G.698.2. This model supports parameters to characterize coherent transceivers found in current implementations to specify the mode of operation. As application identifiers like those specified in [ITU-T_G.874], [ITU-T_G.874.1], [ITU-T_G.698.2] and [ITU-T_G.959.1] may not always be available, mode templates are used. A mode template describes transceiver characteristics in detail and can be identified by a mode-id. This draft refers to [RFC7698] use cases and is aligned to the definition of [RFC9093] and its update in I-D [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis]. Finally, the models described in this draft are compliant with the models described in [I-D.ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang] and [I-D.ietf-ccamp-wdm-tunnel-yang]. The key concept introduced by this YANG model in accordance with I-D [I-D.ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang] and [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis] is the notion of a mode. A mode is a combination of parameters and parameter ranges that is supported by a transceiver. As an example, operating a device in QPSK modulation may use a different FEC and requires less OSNR than the same transceiver operating in QAM16 modulation. Given the number of parameters and their possible combinations it is important for vendors to be able to qualify a set of combinations which is the basis to define a mode. As described in [I-D.ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang] and modeled in [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis], the list of transceiver modes (properly classified in standard, organizational and explicit modes) provide information about the transmission capabilities of an optical DWDM interface. The same approach is used in this RFC to allow the device netconf agent to export such capabilities to the client controllers. To advertise the capability supported by an interface, a list of transceiver modes is provided by the device for each dwdm coherent module (supported-modes). The YANG model provides a configuration attribute named "configured- mode" as a means to provision the working mode of the interface from the supported-modes listed as capabilities. Once provisioned, wdm- if-config container provides the means to configure specific parameters at run time while wdm-if-status container allow to retrieve operational state information from the module as defined in [ITU-T_G.7710]. For example, the frequency is a parameter that can Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 3] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 be set within min/max boundaries defined in the current mode. Laser Temperature, RX/TX optical power, RX OSNR, etc. however are read-only parameters available at run-time that can be checked against the mode boundaries and may trigger events. 1.1. Terminology Refer to [RFC6566], [RFC7698], and [ITU-T_G.807] for the key terms used in this document. The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] * client * server * augment * data model * data node The following terms are defined in [RFC6241] * configuration data * state data The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC7950]. The term DWDM Network Element refers to a physical device, which is managed as a single network element, that has Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing capabilities. The term DWDM Link refers to a physical optical link (fiber pair) between two DWDM Network Elements where one or multiple channels are transmitted using Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing technology. The term DWDM interface refers to an interface, as defined and modelled in [RFC8343], that is capable to generate and receive a signal at a specific wavelength and suitable to be transmitted over a DWDM Link. The term ROADM in this document refers to the term "multi-degree reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexer (MD-ROADM)" as defined in [ITU-T_G.672]. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 4] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 1.2. Tree Diagram A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in the Appendix of document Appendix C. The meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is defined in [RFC8340]. 1.3. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. This document is structured following the guidelines for documents containing YANG Data defined in [RFC8407] and its update in [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis] 2. Module Description 2.1. Overview Figure 1 shows a set of reference points, for single-channel connection between transmitters (TX) and receivers (RX). Here the DWDM network elements include an OM (Optical Multiplexer) and an OD (Optical Demultiplexer) which are used as a pair with the opposing element, one or more optical amplifiers and may also include one or more ROADMs. Is to be noted that the TX L1 and RX L1 may be located outside the DWDM network and fitted in the packet layer network elements as pluggable modules. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 5] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 Ss +-------------------------------------------------+ Rs | | DWDM Network Elements | | +---+ | | | \ / | | | +---+ TX L1---|->| \ +------+ +------+ / |--|-->RX L1 +---+ | | | | | +------+ | | | | | +---+ +---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | +---+ TX L2---|->| OM |-->|------|->|ROADM |--|------|->| OD |--|-->RX L2 +---+ | | | | | | | | | | | | +---+ +---+ | | | | | +------+ | | | | | +---+ TX L3---|->| / | DWDM | | ^ | DWDM | \ |--|-->RX L4 +---+ | | / | Link +----|--|----+ Link | \ | | +---+ +-----------+ | | +----------+ +----+ +----+ | | Rs v | Ss +-----+ +-----+ |RX L3| |TX L4| +-----+ +-----+ Ss = reference point at the DWDM network element tributary output Rs = reference point at the DWDM network element tributary input Lx = Lambda x OM = Optical Mux OD = Optical Demux ROADM = Reconfigurable Optical Add Drop Multiplexer Figure 1: Transponder in WDM networks from Fig. 5.1/G.698.2 This document introduces the ietf-wdm-interface model as an augment to the ietf-interface. It allows the client to set the operating mode of transceivers as well as other operational parameters. The YANG model also provide the container wdm-if-tca for the configuration of Threshold Crossing Alert (TCA) that can trigger stateless notification to supervise parameters and notify the client. 2.2. YANG Module Classification The model defined in this RFC is meant to be used as Device Model as per definition in [RFC8199] and [RFC8309] Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 6] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 2.3. Optical Parameters Description The network architecture presented in Figure 1 is described in [ITU-T_G.698.2] section 5.2. The transponders are usually a combination of the TX and RX function in single interface, implementing the connectivity at Rs and Ss points in a bidirectional way. Definitions of the optical parameters introduced in this document are listed in the YANG tree in Appendix C and described within the model definition in Section 3 2.4. Use Cases The use cases are described in draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment- topology-yang, draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability and draft- poidt-ccamp-actn-poi-pluggable-usecases-gaps. 3. WDM Interface YANG Module ietf-wdm-interface is a top level model that allow the configuration and monitoring of DWDM interfaces optical parameters. It is defined as an extension to ietf-interfaces. <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-wdm-interface.yang" module ietf-wdm-interface { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-wdm-interface"; prefix wdm-if; import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; } import ietf-layer0-types { // Requires at least revision 2025-10-10 // will update with rev:recommended-min-date 2025-xx-yy; // once RFC9093bis get published prefix "l0-types"; } organization "IETF CCAMP Working Group"; contact "WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/> WG List: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org> Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 7] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 Editor: Dharini Hiremagalur <mailto:dharinih@juniper.net> Editor: Gabriele Galimberti <mailto:ggalimbe56@gmail.com> Editor: Gert Grammel <mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net> Editor: Roberto Manzotti <mailto:rmanzott@cisco.com>"; description "This module contains a collection of YANG definitions for configuring DWDM Optical interfaces. Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices. The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here."; // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove // this note // replace the revision date with the module publication date // the format is (year-month-day) revision "2025-10-17" { description "v1.0 Initial Version"; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG data model to manage configurable DWDM optical interfaces"; // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number, update date // information and remove this note } identity wdm-if-tca-type { description "The different types of Threshold Crossing Alert (TCA's) Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 8] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 for DWDM Interfaces. Any augmentation of the list of tca-type MUST use this identity as base"; } identity laser-linewdt-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The laser linewidth TCA"; } identity tx-power-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The Interface Transmit power TCA"; } identity rx-power-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The Interface Receive power TCA"; } identity rx-pol-power-diff-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The X-Y power difference between the two polarizations TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-pol-skew-diff-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The X-Y skew between the two polarizations TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-cd-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The fiber chromatic dispersion (CD) TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-pmd-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The polarization mode dispersion (PMD) TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-pdl-tca { Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 9] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The polarization dependent loss (PDL) TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-frequency-offset-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "The Frequency offset TCA "; } identity rx-osnr-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR) TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity laser-temperature-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "Laser temperature TCA on the transmiter laser"; } identity rx-pre-fec-ber-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "Pre-FEC Bit Error Rate (BER) TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-uncorrected-words-tca { base wdm-if-tca-type; description "Counter of Post-FEC uncorrected words TCA on the receiver interface"; } identity rx-q-factor-tca{ base wdm-if-tca-type; description "Q-Factor TCA on the receiver interface"; } grouping wdm-if-tca-thresholds { description "Thresholds for TCA's"; leaf tca-type { type identityref { base wdm-if-tca-type; Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 10] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 } mandatory true; description "type of the TCA that identify the performance measurement, eg tx-power-tca"; } leaf tca-name { type string; mandatory true; description "A textual name of the TCA that explain its scope eg 'TX Power Degrade'"; } leaf raise-threshold { type l0-types:decimal-5; mandatory true; description "A TCA is raised if the variable cross this threshold: - if raise-threshold is greater than clear-threshold (or clear threshold is not defined), the TCA is raised when the value exceed the threshold - if raise-threshold is smaller that clear-threshold, the TCA is raised when the value fall below the threshold - if clear-threshold is not defined the TCA raise and clear on the same raise-threshold"; } leaf clear-threshold { type l0-types:decimal-5; description "A TCA cleared when the variable cross the threshold in the direction defined for raise-threshold. If clear-threshold is not defined the TCA raise and cleare on the same raise-threshold"; } } // end grouping wdm-if-tca-threshold grouping wdm-if-tca-list { description "List of TCA's"; leaf number-of-tcas-supported { type uint32; default 0; config false; description "Number of TCAs supported by this interface, if the implementation do not suport TCAs it SHALL leave this value to defualt = 0"; } list tca-list { Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 11] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 key "tca-id"; description "List of the TCAs"; leaf tca-id { type string; mandatory true; description "Unique Identifier of the TCA defined for the interface"; } uses wdm-if-tca-thresholds; } } // end grouping wdm-if-tca-list grouping wdm-if-config { description "DWDM Interface Configuration parameters"; leaf target-central-frequency { type l0-types:frequency-thz; description "This parameter indicates the interface Central Frequency configuration."; } leaf target-tx-channel-power { type l0-types:power-dbm; description "This parameter indicates the terget configured TX channel optical power."; } } // end grouping wdm-if-node-params grouping wdm-if-operational { description "DWDM Interface Operational status data"; leaf central-frequency { type l0-types:frequency-thz; config false; description "This parameter indicates the current interface Central Frequency."; } leaf cur-osnr { type l0-types:snr-or-unknown; units "dB"; default unknown; config false; description "Current measured Optical Signal to Noise Ratio (OSNR), Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 12] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; } leaf min-osnr-margin { type l0-types:snr-or-unknown; default unknown; config false; description "Optical Signal to Noise (OSNR) margin to FEC threshold, if not supported by the implementation SHALL remain undefined"; } leaf q-margin { type l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown; units "dB"; default unknown; config false; description "Q-Factor margin to FEC threshold, if not supported by the implementationp SHALL remaoin undefined"; reference "ITU-T O.201 (07/2003): Q-factor test equipment to estimate the transmission performance of optical channels"; } leaf q-factor { type l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown; units "dB"; default unknown; config false; description "Current measured Q-Factor of the interface, if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; reference "ITU-T O.201 (07/2003): Q-factor test equipment to estimate the transmission performance of optical channels"; } leaf uncorrected-words { type uint64; config false; description "Counter of Post-FEC uncorrected errored words, if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; } leaf pre-fec-ber { type l0-types:decimal-18-or-unknown; default unknown; config false; Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 13] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 description "Current measured Pre-FEC error rate, if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; } leaf chromatic-dispersion { type l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown; units "ps/nm"; default unknown; config false; description "Chromatic ispersion (CD) on the receive, if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; reference "RFC ZZZZ: A YANG Data Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology, Section 2.4.6"; } leaf polarization-mode-dispersion { type l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown; units "ps"; default unknown; config false; description "Current polarization mode dispersion (PMD) on the receive, if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; reference "ITU-T G.666 (02/2011): Characteristics of polarization mode dispersion compensators and of receivers that compensate for polarization mode dispersion RFC ZZZZ: A YANG Data Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology, Section 2.4.6"; } leaf polarization-dependent-loss { type l0-types:power-loss-or-unknown; default unknown; config false; description "Current polarization dependent loss (PDL) on the receive, if not supported by the implementation SHALL not be present"; reference "RFC ZZZZ: A YANG Data Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology, Section 2.4.6"; } } // end grouping wdm-if-operational notification wdm-if-tca { description "A notification for a Threshold Crossing Alert (TCA)"; Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 14] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 leaf "if-name" { type leafref { path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/if:name"; } mandatory true; description "Interface name"; } leaf tca-type { type identityref { base wdm-if-tca-type; } mandatory true; description "The Type of TCA that have triggered the notification, e.g, tx-power-tca"; } leaf tca-name { type string; mandatory true; description "A textual name of the TCA that have triggered the notification that explain its scope, eg 'TX Power Degrade'"; } } // end notification wdm-if-tca augment "/if:interfaces" { description "Template definition for Optical Interface explicit-modes"; container "wdm-if-templates" { config false; description "Optical Interface explicit-mode templates"; container explicit-transceiver-modes { description "The top level container for the list of the transceivers' explicit modes."; list explicit-transceiver-mode { key explicit-transceiver-mode-id; description "The list of the transceivers' explicit modes."; leaf explicit-transceiver-mode-id { type string; description "The identifier of the transceivers' explicit mode."; } uses l0-types:explicit-mode; } // end list explicit-transceiver-mode } // end container explicit-transceiver-modes } // end container wdm-if-templates } // end augmentation interfaces Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 15] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { description "Parameters for an optical interface"; container wdm-interface { description "Container for capabilities, configuration, current operational data for a DWDM interface"; uses l0-types:transceiver-capabilities { augment "supported-modes/supported-mode/mode/" + "explicit-mode/explicit-mode" { description "Augment the explicit-mode container with the proper leafref."; leaf explicit-transceiver-mode-ref { type leafref { path "../../../../../../wdm-if:wdm-if-templates" + "/wdm-if:explicit-transceiver-modes" + "/wdm-if:explicit-transceiver-mode" + "/wdm-if:explicit-transceiver-mode-id"; } config false; mandatory true; description "The reference to the explicit transceiver mode template."; } // end explicit-transceiver-mode-ref } // end augmentation explicit-mode } // end uses l0-types:transceiver-capabilities container wdm-if-config { description "Configuration parameters of this interface"; leaf configured-mode { type union { type empty; type leafref { path "../../supported-modes/supported-mode/mode-id"; } } default empty; description "Reference to the configured mode for transceiver compatibility approach. The empty value is used to report that no mode has been configured and there is no default mode. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 16] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 When not present, the configured-mode is not reported by the server, this means the interface is not configured"; } uses wdm-if-config; } // end container wdm-if-config container wdm-if-tcas { description "Threshold Crossing Alerts definition and configuration"; uses wdm-if-tca-list; } // end of container wdm-if-tcas container wdm-if-status { config false; description "Current operationa status parameters of this interface"; uses l0-types:common-transceiver-param { refine "tx-channel-power" { config false; } refine "line-coding-bitrate" { config false; } } uses wdm-if-operational; } // end container wdm-if-status } // end container wdm-interface } // end augmentation interface } // end module <CODE ENDS> 4. Security Considerations This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 of [RFC8407] and the update in draft [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis]. The "ietf-wdm-interface" YANG module defines a data model that is designed to be accessed via YANG-based management protocols, such as NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. These protocols have to use a secure transport layer (e.g., SSH [RFC4252], TLS [RFC8446], and QUIC [RFC9000]) and have to use mutual authentication. The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 17] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., "config true", which is the default). All writable data nodes are likely to be reasonably sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) and delete operations to these data nodes without proper protection or authentication can have a negative effect on network operations. The following subtrees and data nodes have particular sensitivities/vulnerabilities: augment /if:interfaces/if:interface: +--rw wdm-interface . . . +--rw wdm-if-config | +--rw configured-mode? union | +--rw target-central-frequency? l0-types:frequency-thz | +--rw target-tx-channel-power? l0-types:power-dbm There are no particularly sensitive readable data nodes. 5. IANA Considerations This document registers the following namespace URIs in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688]: -------------------------------------------------------------------- URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-wdm-interface Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This document registers the following YANG modules in the YANG Module Names registry [RFC7950]: -------------------------------------------------------------------- name: ietf-wdm-interface namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-wdm-interface prefix: wdm-if reference: RFC XXXX (TDB) -------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Acknowledgements Italo Busi Huawei Technologies Email: Italo.Busi@huawei.com Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 18] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 7. Contributors Ruediger Kunze Deutsche Telekom Winterfeldtstr. 21-27 10781 Berlin Germany +491702275321 RKunze@telekom.de Dean Bogdanovic Westford U.S.A. email ivandean@gmail.com Bernd Zeuner Deutsche Telekom Darmstadt Germany email B.Zeuner@telekom.de Massimiliano Salsi Juniper Networks Sunnyvale, CA, 94089 U.S.A. email msalsi@google.com Manuel Paul Deutsche Telekom Berlin Germany email Manuel.Paul@telekom.de Walid Wakim Nokia ILLINOIS UNITED STATES email wakims@mac.com Hing-Kam Lam Fhusa USA kam.lam@fhusainc.com Sergio Belotti Nokia Via Energy Park 20871 Vimercate (MB) Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 19] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 Italy Sergio.belotti@nokia.com Andreas Burk Architekt Network Automation CTO Board 1und1 Versatel Deutschland GmbH Solmsstr. 73 D-60486 Frankfurt am Main +49 69 21789246 Andreas.Burk@1und1.net 8. References 8.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC8199] Bogdanovic, D., Claise, B., and C. Moberg, "YANG Module Classification", RFC 8199, DOI 10.17487/RFC8199, July 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8199>. [RFC8309] Wu, Q., Liu, W., and A. Farrel, "Service Models Explained", RFC 8309, DOI 10.17487/RFC8309, January 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8309>. [RFC7698] Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Casellas, R., Ed., Zhang, F., Fu, X., Ceccarelli, D., and I. Hussain, "Framework and Requirements for GMPLS-Based Control of Flexi-Grid Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Networks", RFC 7698, DOI 10.17487/RFC7698, November 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7698>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. [RFC9093] Zheng, H., Lee, Y., Guo, A., Lopez, V., and D. King, "A YANG Data Model for Layer 0 Types", RFC 9093, DOI 10.17487/RFC9093, August 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9093>. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 20] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 [I-D.ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis] Belotti, S., Busi, I., Beller, D., Le Rouzic, E., and A. Guo, "Common YANG Data Types for Layer 0 Optical Networks", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- ccamp-rfc9093-bis-18, 10 October 2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ccamp- rfc9093-bis-18>. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang] Beller, D., Le Rouzic, E., Belotti, S., Galimberti, G., and I. Busi, "A YANG Data Model for Optical Impairment- aware Topology", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft- ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-20, 10 October 2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf- ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-20>. [I-D.ietf-ccamp-wdm-tunnel-yang] Guo, A., Belotti, S., Galimberti, G., de Madrid, U. A., and D. P. Burrero, "A YANG Data Model for WDM Tunnels", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ccamp-wdm- tunnel-yang-05, 3 July 2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ccamp- wdm-tunnel-yang-05>. [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>. [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>. [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>. [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 21] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 [RFC9000] Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport", RFC 9000, DOI 10.17487/RFC9000, May 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9000>. [RFC4252] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH) Authentication Protocol", RFC 4252, DOI 10.17487/RFC4252, January 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4252>. [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>. [RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343>. [RFC6566] Lee, Y., Ed., Bernstein, G., Ed., Li, D., and G. Martinelli, "A Framework for the Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs) with Impairments", RFC 6566, DOI 10.17487/RFC6566, March 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6566>. [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. [ITU-T_G.698.2] International Telecommunications Union, "Amplified multichannel dense wavelength division multiplexing applications with single channel optical interfaces", ITU-T Recommendation G.698.2, November 2018. [ITU-T_G.709] International Telecommunications Union, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network (OTN)", ITU-T Recommendation G.709, June 2020. [ITU-T_G.872] International Telecommunications Union, "Architecture of optical transport networks", ITU-T Recommendation G.872, June 2020. [ITU-T_G.798] International Telecommunications Union, "Characteristics of optical transport network hierarchy equipment functional blocks", ITU-T Recommendation G.798, September 2023. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 22] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 [ITU-T_G.874] International Telecommunications Union, "Management aspects of optical transport network elements", ITU-T Recommendation G.874, October 2020. [ITU-T_G.874.1] International Telecommunications Union, "Optical transport network (OTN): Protocol-neutral management information model for the network element view", ITU-T Recommendation G.874.1, November 2016. [ITU-T_G.959.1] International Telecommunications Union, "Optical transport network physical layer interfaces", ITU-T Recommendation G.959.1, January 2024. [ITU-T_G.8201] International Telecommunications Union, "Error performance parameters and objectives for multi-operator international paths within the Optical Transport Network (OTN)", ITU-T Recommendation G.8201, April 2011. [ITU-T_G.694.1] International Telecommunications Union, "Spectral grids for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid", ITU-T Recommendation G.694.1, October 2020. [ITU-T_G.7710] International Telecommunications Union, "Common equipment management function requirements", ITU-T Recommendation G.7710, October 2020. [ITU-T_G.672] International Telecommunications Union, "Characteristics of multi-degree reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers", ITU-T Recommendation G.672, May 2025. [ITU-T_G.807] International Telecommunications Union, "Generic functional architecture of the optical media layer", ITU-T Recommendation G.807, October 2024. 8.2. Informative References [RFC8407] Bierman, A., "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", BCP 216, RFC 8407, DOI 10.17487/RFC8407, October 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8407>. Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 23] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis] Bierman, A., Boucadair, M., and Q. Wu, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- netmod-rfc8407bis-28, 5 June 2025, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod- rfc8407bis-28>. Appendix A. Change Log This optional section should be removed before the internet draft is submitted to the IESG for publication as an RFC. Note to RFC Editor: please remove this appendix before publication as an RFC. Appendix B. Open Issues // TEMPLATE TODO This list of issues listed in this optional section // should be cleared and removed, and this optional section should be // removed before the internet draft is submitted to the IESG for // publication as an RFC. Note to RFC Editor: please remove this appendix before publication as an RFC. Appendix C. YANG Tree module: ietf-wdm-interface augment /if:interfaces: +--ro wdm-if-templates +--ro explicit-transceiver-modes +--ro explicit-transceiver-mode* [explicit-transceiver-mode-id] +--ro explicit-transceiver-mode-id string +--ro line-coding-bitrate? identityref +--ro bitrate? uint16 +--ro max-diff-group-delay? decimal-2 +--ro max-chromatic-dispersion? decimal-2 +--ro cd-penalty* [cd-value] | +--ro cd-value decimal-2 | +--ro penalty-value union +--ro max-polarization-mode-dispersion? decimal-2 +--ro pmd-penalty* [pmd-value] | +--ro pmd-value decimal-2 | +--ro penalty-value union Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 24] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 +--ro max-polarization-dependent-loss | power-loss-or-unknown +--ro pdl-penalty* [pdl-value] | +--ro pdl-value power-loss | +--ro penalty-value union +--ro available-modulation-type? identityref +--ro min-OSNR? snr +--ro rx-ref-channel-power? power-dbm +--ro rx-channel-power-penalty* [rx-channel-power-value] | +--ro rx-channel-power-value power-dbm | +--ro penalty-value union +--ro min-Q-factor? decimal-2 +--ro available-baud-rate? decimal64 +--ro roll-off? decimal64 +--ro min-carrier-spacing? frequency-ghz +--ro available-fec-type? identityref +--ro fec-code-rate? decimal64 +--ro fec-threshold? decimal64 +--ro in-band-osnr? snr +--ro out-of-band-osnr? snr +--ro tx-polarization-power-difference? power-ratio +--ro polarization-skew? decimal-2 augment /if:interfaces/if:interface: +--rw wdm-interface +--ro supported-modes! | +--ro supported-mode* [mode-id] | +--ro mode-id string | +--ro (mode) | +--:(g.698.2) | | +--ro g.698.2 | | +--ro standard-mode standard-mode | | +--ro line-coding-bitrate* identityref | | +--ro transceiver-tuning-range | | | +--ro min-central-frequency? | | | | frequency-thz | | | +--ro max-central-frequency? | | | | frequency-thz | | | +--ro transceiver-tunability-granularity? | | | frequency-ghz | | +--ro tx-channel-power-min? power-dbm | | +--ro tx-channel-power-max? power-dbm | | +--ro rx-channel-power-min? power-dbm | | +--ro rx-channel-power-max? power-dbm | | +--ro rx-total-power-max? power-dbm | +--:(organizational-mode) | | +--ro organizational-mode | | +--ro operational-mode | | | operational-mode Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 25] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 | | +--ro organization-identifier | | | organization-identifier | | +--ro line-coding-bitrate* identityref | | +--ro transceiver-tuning-range | | | +--ro min-central-frequency? | | | | frequency-thz | | | +--ro max-central-frequency? | | | | frequency-thz | | | +--ro transceiver-tunability-granularity? | | | frequency-ghz | | +--ro tx-channel-power-min? power-dbm | | +--ro tx-channel-power-max? power-dbm | | +--ro rx-channel-power-min? power-dbm | | +--ro rx-channel-power-max? power-dbm | | +--ro rx-total-power-max? power-dbm | +--:(explicit-mode) | +--ro explicit-mode | +--ro transceiver-tuning-range | | +--ro min-central-frequency? | | | frequency-thz | | +--ro max-central-frequency? | | | frequency-thz | | +--ro transceiver-tunability-granularity? | | frequency-ghz | +--ro tx-channel-power-min? | | power-dbm | +--ro tx-channel-power-max? | | power-dbm | +--ro rx-channel-power-min? | | power-dbm | +--ro rx-channel-power-max? | | power-dbm | +--ro rx-total-power-max? | | power-dbm | +--ro compatible-modes | | +--ro supported-application-code* | | | -> ../../../../supported-mode/mode-id | | +--ro supported-organizational-mode* | | -> ../../../../supported-mode/mode-id | +--ro explicit-transceiver-mode-ref leafref +--rw wdm-if-config | +--rw configured-mode? union | +--rw target-central-frequency? l0-types:frequency-thz | +--rw target-tx-channel-power? l0-types:power-dbm +--rw wdm-if-tcas | +--ro number-of-tcas-supported? uint32 | +--rw tca-list* [tca-id] | +--rw tca-id string Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 26] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 | +--rw tca-type identityref | +--rw tca-name string | +--rw raise-threshold l0-types:decimal-5 | +--rw clear-threshold? l0-types:decimal-5 +--ro wdm-if-status +--ro line-coding-bitrate? identityref +--ro tx-channel-power? power-dbm-or-unknown +--ro rx-channel-power? power-dbm-or-unknown +--ro rx-total-power? power-dbm-or-unknown +--ro central-frequency? | l0-types:frequency-thz +--ro cur-osnr? | l0-types:snr-or-unknown +--ro min-osnr-margin? | l0-types:snr-or-unknown +--ro q-margin? | l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown +--ro q-factor? | l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown +--ro uncorrected-words? uint64 +--ro pre-fec-ber? | l0-types:decimal-18-or-unknown +--ro chromatic-dispersion? | l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown +--ro polarization-mode-dispersion? | l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown +--ro polarization-dependent-loss? l0-types:power-loss-or-unknown notifications: +---n wdm-if-tca +--ro if-name -> /if:interfaces/interface/name +--ro tca-type identityref +--ro tca-name string Appendix D. Applicability examples As an example here below is the way an OpenROADM compliant equipment could be managed using the YANG models described in this draft. In OpenROADM MSA there is a limited number of DWDM interfaces supported. Basically only the 100G Staircase FEC and 400G oFEC are supported and these two kind of interfaces can be easily summarized with the "mode-id" and the "application-identifier" strings. the models below are enough to identify the interface and few working parameters: Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 27] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 module: ietf-wdm-interface augment /if:interfaces/if:interface: +--rw wdm-interface +--rw wdm-if-config | +--rw configured-mode? union | +--rw target-central-frequency? l0-types:frequency-thz | +--rw target-tx-channel-power? l0-types:power-dbm +--ro wdm-if-status +--ro cur-osnr? +--ro q-factor? | l0-types:decimal-2-or-unknown +--ro uncorrected-words? uint64 +--ro pre-fec-ber? Authors' Addresses Gabriele Galimberti (editor) Nokia Via Melgacciata 13 c 20813 - Bovisio Masciago Italy Phone: +393357481947 Email: ggalimbe56@gmail.com Dharini Hiremagalur (editor) Juniper 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale - 94089 California, United States of America Email: dharinih@juniper.net Gert Grammel (editor) Juniper Oskar-Schlemmer Str. 15 80807 Muenchen Germany Phone: +49 1725186386 Email: ggrammel@juniper.net Roberto Manzotti (editor) Cisco Santa Maria Molgora 48 C 20871 Vimercate Italy Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 28] Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang-14 October 2025 Phone: +390392091280 Email: rmanzott@cisco.com Dirk Breuer (editor) DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG Winterfeldtstr 21 10781 Berlin Germany Phone: +4930835358828 Email: d.breuer@telekom.de Galimberti, et al. Expires 20 April 2026 [Page 29]