Software Version Capability for BGP
draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-18
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Donatas Abraitis | ||
| Last updated | 2025-09-07 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
| Formats | |||
| IETF conflict review | conflict-review-abraitis-bgp-version-capability | ||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed |
draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-18
Inter-Domain Routing D. Abraitis
Internet-Draft Hostinger
Intended status: Informational 7 September 2025
Expires: 11 March 2026
Software Version Capability for BGP
draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-18
Abstract
In this document, we introduce a new BGP capability that allows the
advertisement of a BGP speaker's routing software version.
This BGP capability is an optional advertisement. Implementations
are not required to advertise the version nor to process received
advertisements.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 11 March 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Specification of Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Software Version Capability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3.1. Capabilities Length Overflow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Appendix A. Implementation Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1. Introduction
In modern data center designs, conventional routers participating in
routing. These routers may have different versions of routing
software. Knowing which versions of the routing software that are
running on the various routers in the network can be a crucial factor
in quickly identifying the root cause of protocol or network
problems.
This document specifies a BGP capability that carries the routing
software version. This BGP capability is a optional.
Implementations are not required to advertise their software version
nor to process it on receipt.
Information about the version of the routing software could also be
exchanged in protocols such as LLDP and CDP. However, in
containerized environments, it is difficult and not recommended to
exchange this information between background processes. To assist in
minimizing operational costs, it is helpful to exchange the routing
software versions between BGP peers directly.
2. Specification of Requirements
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
3. Software Version Capability
Although this document is not an IETF Standards Track document, it
makes use of the terminology from BCP 14 in order to clearly state
the implementation behaviors.
BGP capability advertisement is defined in [RFC5492]. BGP
Capabilities contain one or more triples <Capability Code, Capability
Length, Capability Value>. This document defines a new BGP
capability, the Software Version Capability, with Capability Code 75
and Capability Length and Capability Value as described below.
The inclusion of the Software Version Capability is OPTIONAL. If an
implementation supports the inclusion of the capability, the
implementation MUST include a configuration option to enable or
disable its use, and MUST default to disabled.
The Software Version Capability is intended for environments where
more visibility is needed for troubleshooting purposes. It is NOT
RECOMMENDED for use outside a single Autonomous System, or a set of
Autonomous Systems under a common administration.
An implementation that does not recognize or support the Software
Version Capability but receives one must ignore it, as described in
Section 3 of [RFC5492].
The triple for the Software Version Capability is as follows:
Capability Code
75
Capability Length
Capability Length is a one-octet unsigned binary integer that
contains the length of the Capability Value field in octets.
The Capability Length for the Software Version Capability MUST be
greater than zero. A value of zero SHALL be treated as an
encoding error and the Capability MUST be ignored.
The Capability Length SHOULD be no greater than 64. This length
leaves space for other capabilities.
Capability Value
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
The Capability Value field is the software version encoded as a
UTF-8 [RFC3629] string. It is unstructured data and can be
formatted in any way that the implementor decides. The string is
not null-terminated.
Version:
The Version field MUST be encoded using UTF-8. A receiving BGP
speaker MUST NOT interpret invalid UTF-8 sequences.
The value consists of one identifier, which identifies the
software and its significant version. Software version identifier
consists of a product and optional product version.
identifier = product ["/" product-version]
A sender SHOULD limit generated product identifiers to what is
necessary to identify the product; a sender MUST NOT generate
advertising or other nonessential information within the product
identifier. A sender SHOULD NOT generate information in product-
version that is not a version identifier (i.e., successive
versions of the same product name ought to differ only in the
product-version portion of the product identifier).
Example:
frrouting/8.4.2, ios/12.5.1, junos/12.1
3.1. Capabilities Length Overflow
As defined in [RFC5492] the total length of capabilities that can be
carried by the BGP Capabilities Optional Parameter is 255 bytes. If
an implementation is constructing a BGP Capabilities Optional
Parameter and its length exceeds 255 bytes, there is not enough space
for other more important capabilities.
Implementations of this specification are REQUIRED Extended Optional
Parameters Length for BGP OPEN Message support as defined in
[RFC9072].
A rogue node can prevent the proper operation of a BGP session, or
the advertisement of other Capabilities, by not excluding the
Software Version Capability as required in Section 3.1. This risk is
equivalent to a rogue node simply not advertising a specific
Capability and is not new to BGP.
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
4. Operation
The Software Version Capability MUST only be used for displaying the
version of a BGP speaker's router daemon to make troubleshooting
easier.
Consider a group of routers each with a number of upstream nodes, and
suppose that each router has a different operating system and
different routing software at a different installed version.
Assuming that a specific feature is not working or that there is a
bug which has not been fixed in a particular version of the code,
knowledge of the routing daemon versions would allow an operator to
quickly identify the pattern of which versions are affected.
Enabling (i.e., turning on) this capability requires bouncing all
existing BGP sessions and the feature MUST be explicitly configured
before an implementation advertizes the Software Version Capability.
5. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned capability number 75 for the Software Version
Capability described in this document. This registration is in the
BGP Capability Codes registry.
+=======+=============================+
| Value | Description |
+=======+=============================+
| 75 | Software Version Capability |
+-------+-----------------------------+
Table 1: Software Version Capability
6. Security Considerations
The Software Version Capability should be treated as sensitive
information: it could be easier for an attacker to exploit the system
if they know the specific software version and manufacturer of a BGP
speaker. This information could be gathered by inspecting BGP OPEN
messages that carry the Software Version Capability defined in this
document. Furthermore, this knowledge may facilitate a number of
social-engineering attacks.
Modifying the information advertised by a router might lead to
attacks including bogus software upgrades and also might mask the
causes of faults in the network.
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
Users of this mechanism should be aware that unless a transport that
provides integrity is used for the BGP session in question, the
Software Version Capability can be forged. Unless a transport that
provides confidentiality is used, the Version Capability could be
snooped by an attacker. These issues are common to any BGP message
but may be of greater interest in the context of this extension as
explained above. Refer to the related considerations in [RFC4271]
and [RFC4272].
Users of this mechanism should consider applying data minimization
practices as outlined in Section 6.1 of [RFC6973], as appropriate
within the deployment context.
Sensitive information leaks can be minimized by using the Generalized
TTL security mechanism [RFC5082] or firewalls to filter out TCP 179
port from untrusted networks. This capability should be enabled per
neighbor, thus limiting the disclosure of sensitive information to
trusted neighbors.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Alvaro Retana, Jakob Heitz, Robert Raszuk, Adrian Farrel,
John Scudder, Jeffrey Haas, Enke Chen for the review, discussions and
input to the draft.
References
Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.
[RFC4271] Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A
Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, January 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC4272] Murphy, S., "BGP Security Vulnerabilities Analysis",
RFC 4272, DOI 10.17487/RFC4272, January 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4272>.
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
[RFC5082] Gill, V., Heasley, J., Meyer, D., Savola, P., Ed., and C.
Pignataro, "The Generalized TTL Security Mechanism
(GTSM)", RFC 5082, DOI 10.17487/RFC5082, October 2007,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5082>.
[RFC5492] Scudder, J. and R. Chandra, "Capabilities Advertisement
with BGP-4", RFC 5492, DOI 10.17487/RFC5492, February
2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5492>.
[RFC6973] Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J.,
Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, "Privacy
Considerations for Internet Protocols", RFC 6973,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6973, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6973>.
[RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC9072] Chen, E. and J. Scudder, "Extended Optional Parameters
Length for BGP OPEN Message", RFC 9072,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9072, July 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9072>.
Appendix A. Implementation Report
According to [RFC7942], "This will allow reviewers and working groups
to assign due consideration to documents that have the benefit of
running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable experimentation
and feedback that have made the implemented protocols more mature".
FRRouting (https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/commit/
c4257900c4ca320117bcd1f88b7f036e0c8f7fcb) implementation.
GoBGP (https://github.com/osrg/gobgp/pull/2622/
commits/15f9d5c64c98d1db273cc45e95fcc11843fba4b5) implementation.
freeRouter (https://github.com/mc36/freeRtr/commit/
eb5d3490aec220ad8bfcbf1f439669bd27845199) implementation.
ExaBGP (https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp/pull/1223/commits/
d21e432c98ec9cbe1de2e471ecf7326170d7f176) implementation.
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Software Version Capability for BGP September 2025
Below is an example from the FRRouting and GoBGP implementations
showing both the received and advertised Software Version Capability:
:~# vtysh -c 'show ip bgp summary failed'
...
Neighbor EstdCnt DropCnt ResetTime Reason
ens192 3 3 00:00:35 Waiting for peer OPEN (n/a)
ens224 3 3 00:01:12 Waiting for NHT (frrouting/7.2)
eth0 3 3 00:00:14 Neighbor deleted (frrouting/7.3)
...
Figure 1
software-version: advertised and received
Local:
GoBGP/3.10.0
Remote:
FRRouting/8.5-dev-MyOwnFRRVersion-gdc92f44a4
Figure 2
:~# vtysh -c 'show ip bgp neighbors 198.51.100.1 json' \
> | jq '."198.51.100.1".neighborCapabilities.versions'
{
"advertisedVersion": "frrouting/7.2",
"receivedVersion": "frrouting/7.3"
}
Figure 3
Author's Address
Donatas Abraitis
Hostinger
Email: donatas.abraitis@gmail.com
Abraitis Expires 11 March 2026 [Page 8]