Assessment Integrity Candidates Respect

CoderPad pairs AI-aware, project-based assessments with layered detection and fair monitoring—so you can trust the signal without treating candidates like suspects.

Request a demo

Key Outcomes for Fraud & Cheating Detection

  • check
    Harder to Game, Better Signal Open-ended, multi-file projects are intentionally difficult to one-shot with AI and expose the reasoning you actually hire for.
  • check
    Real-Time Detection at Scale Catch suspicious behavior across high-volume campaigns with automated alerts (IDE exit, external paste), code playback, and workflows to flag or auto-reject.
  • check
    Respectful, Transparent Monitoring Balance integrity with experience: evaluate real-world skills (including how candidates use AI) rather than relying on heavy-handed surveillance.
  • check
    Fewer False Positives/Negatives Real projects add depth and complexity that reveal true capability—reducing “perfect test, poor onsite” outcomes.

Why does this matter now?

Traditional MCQ/Leetcode tasks are easily handled by AI; single-file, single-answer challenges are widely compromised. Integrity has to be designed into both content and controls.

Solve your Top Challenges in Fraud & Cheating Detection

Cheating & Integrity ChallengesCoderPad Solutions
AI tools trivialize MCQ/Leetcode; content leaksMulti-file, job-relevant projects that require human reasoning and explanation.
“Silent paste” / help from others is hard to spotCode similarity checks, code playback, IP tracking, and IDE exit tracking highlight anomalous behavior.
Large university or early-talent drives make manual review impossibleRobust cheat mitigation & detection across hundreds of candidates with scalable workflows.
Heavy proctoring hurts candidate experience“Surveillance vs. Reality” approach—evaluate real skills (including AI collaboration) while applying appropriate monitoring.
Need evidence, not suspicionOptional webcam proctoring with AI image analysis, plus audit trails via playback and pad summaries.