Message 366446 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner
Date	2020-04-14.21:04:50
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I agree I don't need it per se. However, I suspect that for non-exports it would be easier than `getrandbits(nbytes * 8).to_bytes(nbytes, 'endian')`. As for `secrets.token_bytes()`, it's not really adequate for regular pseudo-random data generation when you want to use a fixed seed. And I'm not sure what its performance characteristics are when you pass a large size.

I agree I don't *need* it per se.  However, I suspect that for non-exports it would be easier than
`getrandbits(nbytes * 8).to_bytes(nbytes, 'endian')`.

As for `secrets.token_bytes()`, it's not really adequate for regular pseudo-random data generation when you want to use a fixed seed.  And I'm not sure what its performance characteristics are when you pass a large size.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-04-14 21:04:50	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, steven.daprano, serhiy.storchaka
2020-04-14 21:04:50	pitrou	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2020-04-14 21:04:50	pitrou	link	issue40282 messages
2020-04-14 21:04:50	pitrou	create