Message 328429 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	taleinat
Recipients	eli.bendersky, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, taleinat
Date	2018-10-25.12:17:05
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
This doesn't strike me as a bug, or even clearly being a potential improvement. If this about round-trip parsing/serializing not preserving order, that would be significant. As it is, if this is only intended as a debugging tool, why change it? Is there a concrete reason to change this and break backwards compatibility? If not I suggest we close this as "won't fix".

This doesn't strike me as a bug, or even clearly being a potential improvement.

If this about round-trip parsing/serializing not preserving order, that would be significant. As it is, if this is only intended as a debugging tool, why change it?

Is there a concrete reason to change this and break backwards compatibility? If not I suggest we close this as "won't fix".

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2018-10-25 12:17:05	taleinat	set	recipients: + taleinat, rhettinger, scoder, eli.bendersky, serhiy.storchaka
2018-10-25 12:17:05	taleinat	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2018-10-25 12:17:05	taleinat	link	issue34160 messages
2018-10-25 12:17:05	taleinat	create