Message 215250 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nikratio
Recipients	Claudiu.Popa, docs@python, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, nikratio, scoder
Date	2014-03-31.16:37:56
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Yes, the new testcases were deliberately included. I submitted the patch prior to the 3.4 release, am I right that at that point this wouldn't have been a problem? I have attached a new patch containing just the doc changes. I hope that's still acceptable for inclusion in 3.4 (and maybe 3.3? not sure if there'll be another bugfix release).

Yes, the new testcases were deliberately included. I submitted the patch prior to the 3.4 release, am I right that at that point this wouldn't have been a problem?

I have attached a new patch containing just the doc changes. I hope that's still acceptable for inclusion in 3.4 (and maybe 3.3? not sure if there'll be another bugfix release).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-03-31 16:37:57	nikratio	set	recipients: + nikratio, georg.brandl, scoder, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, eli.bendersky, docs@python, Claudiu.Popa
2014-03-31 16:37:57	nikratio	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2014-03-31 16:37:57	nikratio	link	issue20375 messages
2014-03-31 16:37:57	nikratio	create