Message 114888 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	asksol
Recipients	Albert.Strasheim, asksol, brian.curtin, jnoller, vlasovskikh
Date	2010-08-25.08:43:30
SpamBayes Score	0.00027509403
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
On closer look your patch is also ignoring SystemExit. I think it's beneficial to honor SystemExit, so a user could use this as a means to replace the current process with a new one. If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the result handler hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is going to be handled by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate?

On closer look your patch is also ignoring SystemExit. I think it's beneficial to honor SystemExit, so a user could use this as a means to replace the current process with a new one.

If we keep that behavior, the real problem here is that the
result handler hangs if the process that reserved a job is gone, which is going to be handled
by #9205. Should we mark it as a duplicate?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-08-25 08:43:32	asksol	set	recipients: + asksol, jnoller, brian.curtin, vlasovskikh, Albert.Strasheim
2010-08-25 08:43:32	asksol	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-08-25 08:43:30	asksol	link	issue8296 messages
2010-08-25 08:43:30	asksol	create