Message 108441 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mark.dickinson
Recipients	belopolsky, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner
Date	2010-06-23.08:41:51
SpamBayes Score	0.040393338
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
Either of these looks good to me. If the last line of the second is changed from "return int(r) % n" to "return int(r) // (N // n)" then it'll use the high-order bits of random() instead of the low-order bits. This doesn't matter for MT, but might matter for subclasses of Random using a different underlying generator.

Either of these looks good to me.

If the last line of the second is changed from "return int(r) % n" to "return int(r) // (N // n)" then it'll use the high-order bits of random()  instead of the low-order bits.  This doesn't matter for MT, but might matter for subclasses of Random using a different underlying generator.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-06-23 08:41:55	mark.dickinson	set	recipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, terry.reedy, belopolsky, vstinner
2010-06-23 08:41:55	mark.dickinson	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2010-06-23 08:41:51	mark.dickinson	link	issue9025 messages
2010-06-23 08:41:51	mark.dickinson	create