Message108023
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Marc-Andre Lemburg <[email protected]> wrote:
..
> To avoid the wasted memory and import time, it's better to use:
>
> try:
> from _cmodule import *
> except ImportError:
> from _pymodule import *
>
Hmm, I cannot find the relevant thread, but I thought this was rejected at some point. Personally, I don't like this at all for the following reasons:
1. This introduces two _.. names instead of one.
2. This departs from established convention that C (or native) implementation for modulename is in _modulename, not _cmodulename. Non-C implementations may still provide native _modulename, but would not want to call it _cmodulename.
3. Hiding python code in _pymodule makes it harder to find it.
..
> Why not import the two modules directly ?
>
> import _cmodule as module
> and
> import _pymodule as module
>
Because this requires having two modules in the first place. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2010-06-17 14:45:23 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, lemburg, brett.cannon, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010-06-17 14:45:23 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <[email protected]> |
| 2010-06-17 14:45:21 | belopolsky | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010-06-17 14:45:20 | belopolsky | create | |
|