[#108176] [Ruby master Bug#18679] Encoding::UndefinedConversionError: "\xE2" from ASCII-8BIT to UTF-8 — "taf2 (Todd Fisher)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18679 has been reported by taf2 (Todd Fisher).

8 messages 2022/04/05

[#108185] [Ruby master Feature#18683] Allow to create hashes with a specific capacity. — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18683 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

13 messages 2022/04/06

[#108198] [Ruby master Feature#18685] Enumerator.product: Cartesian product of enumerators — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18685 has been reported by knu (Akinori MUSHA).

8 messages 2022/04/08

[#108201] [Ruby master Misc#18687] [ANN] Upgraded bugs.ruby-lang.org to Redmine 5.0 — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18687 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

10 messages 2022/04/09

[#108216] [Ruby master Misc#18691] An option to run `make rbconfig.rb` in a different directory — "jaruga (Jun Aruga)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18691 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

14 messages 2022/04/12

[#108225] [Ruby master Misc#18726] CI Error on c99 and c2x — "znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18726 has been reported by znz (Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA).

11 messages 2022/04/14

[#108235] [Ruby master Bug#18729] Method#owner and UnboundMethod#owner are incorrect after using Module#public/protected/private — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18729 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

28 messages 2022/04/14

[#108237] [Ruby master Bug#18730] Double `return` event handling with different tracepoints — "hurricup (Alexandr Evstigneev)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18730 has been reported by hurricup (Alexandr Evstigneev).

8 messages 2022/04/14

[#108294] [Ruby master Bug#18743] Enumerator#next / peek re-use each others stacktraces — sos4nt <noreply@...>

Issue #18743 has been reported by sos4nt (Stefan Schテシテ殕er).

20 messages 2022/04/19

[#108301] [Ruby master Bug#18744] I used Jazzy to generate the doc for my iOS library, but it showed me a bug — "zhaoxinqiang (marc steven)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18744 has been reported by zhaoxinqiang (marc steven).

8 messages 2022/04/20

[ruby-core:108327] [Ruby master Bug#18622] const_get still looks in Object, while lexical constant lookup no longer does

From: "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-04-21 06:53:16 UTC
List: ruby-core #108327
Issue #18622 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).


For the sake of consistency, it is nice to start searching from the receiver class/module. I really like to fix the behavior, if there's no compatibility issue.
But in reality, changing the behavior possibly affect numerous usage of `const_get` (4000+ appearance by gem search). 
I am not sure this consistency really worth the possible compatibility issues.

Matz.


----------------------------------------
Bug #18622: const_get still looks in Object, while lexical constant lookup no longer does
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18622#change-97348

* Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
There is some inconsistency here between literal constant lookup and the meta API (const_get).

Lexical constant lookup no longer uses a special case for Object, and this is good as it avoids surprises: #11547

However, `const_get` still looks in Object, even though that's confusing, inconsistent and IMHO shouldn't really happen.
```ruby
module ConstantSpecsTwo
  Foo = :cs_two_foo
end

module ConstantSpecs
end

p ConstantSpecs.const_get("ConstantSpecsTwo::Foo") # => :cs_two_foo
p ConstantSpecs::ConstantSpecsTwo::Foo # => const_get.rb:9:in `<main>': uninitialized constant ConstantSpecs::ConstantSpecsTwo (NameError)
```

I think we should change it so both behave the same (i.e., NameError).
It's like if `cd /foo/bar` would go to `/bar` if `/foo/bar` does not exist and `/bar` does.

`const_get` is a meta API so it cannot know the surrounding `Module.nesting`, but so I think it should consider the receiver of `const_get` as the only nesting (so just `ConstantSpecs` in this case, not `Object`).

Note this does not affect nested constants inside the `const_get` like `Foo` above (another way to look at the inconsistency that the first component is treated differently).

From https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11547#note-19



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread