If you're building an application in 2026, the choice of database is one of the most critical technical decisions you'll make. The debate typically centers on two primary options: SQL (Relational) and NoSQL (Document).
Developers often have strong preferences, favoring either the strict structure of SQL or the flexibility of Document databases.
However, neither approach is always superior. Each works best in specific scenarios, and understanding their different strengths is how you choose the right tool for your project.
Relational databases (SQL)
SQL databases (such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MariaDB) organize data into tables with defined rows and columns. This structured approach has been the industry standard for decades for good reason.
Why choose SQL?
- Structure and consistency: SQL enforces a predefined schema. You must define data types—integers, strings, dates—before storing records. This strictness ensures data integrity and predictability across your application.
- Complex relationships: As the name implies, relational databases excel at managing interconnected data. Using JOIN operations, you can efficiently query and aggregate data across multiple tables in a single command.
- Transactional integrity: SQL databases follow ACID properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability). This ensures that transactions are processed reliably, ensuring data accuracy even during system failures—a critical requirement for financial and enterprise systems.
Best use cases
- Financial systems: Applications where data accuracy and transactional integrity are critical.
- Analytical reporting: Projects requiring complex queries and calculations across highly connected data.
- Stable data models: Applications where the data structure is well-understood and unlikely to have frequent, major changes.
Document databases (NoSQL)
Document databases (such as Appwrite Databases and MongoDB) store data as documents, typically in JSON format. This model focuses on flexibility and developer experience.
Why choose document databases?
- Schema flexibility: Unlike SQL, document databases allow you to update your data model without downtime. You can add new fields to a document without changing the entire collection, allowing rapid iteration.
- Developer experience: Data is stored in the same format used in your application code (JSON objects). This removes the need for complex object-relational mapping (ORM) layers, reducing development complexity.
- Horizontal scalability: Many document databases are designed to scale out across multiple servers, making them perfect for high-volume applications that need to handle massive amounts of data and traffic.
Best use cases
- Content management: Platforms like blogs, catalogs, and user profiles where data structures vary between records.
- Rapid prototyping: Projects where the data model is evolving alongside the application features.
- High-scale applications: Systems that require low-latency reads and writes at massive scale.
The AI factor
The rise of AI-assisted coding, or "vibecoding," has changed how many developers approach database selection. Document databases often align more naturally with AI-driven workflows.
Native JSON support: Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained to understand and generate JSON. When an AI agent generates a data object, it can often be saved directly to a document database without the need for translation or mapping layers.
Fluid iteration: AI development involves rapid experimentation. If an agent suggests adding a new attribute to a user profile, a document database accepts this change immediately. In a SQL environment, this would typically require a schema migration, introducing complexity to the creative process.
So while modern SQL databases like PostgreSQL might offer strong JSON support, the document model remains the path of least resistance for many AI-focused workflows.
Build fast, scale faster
Backend infrastructure and web hosting built for developers who ship.
Start for free- Open source
- Support for over 13 SDKs
- Managed cloud solution
At a glance
| Feature | Relational (SQL) | Document (NoSQL) |
Data format | Tables with rows and columns | JSON documents |
Structure | Rigid, requires migrations | Flexible, dynamic |
Relationships | Excellent (JOINs) | Good (often denormalized) |
Reliability | Strong consistency (ACID) | Configurable consistency |
Scaling | Typically vertical | Typically horizontal |
Best for | Structure, complex queries, integrity | Flexibility, speed, scale |
Making the choice
The right database depends entirely on your specific requirements.
- Choose SQL if your data is highly relational, your structure is stable, and data integrity is your top priority.
- Choose Document if you need flexibility, horizontal scaling, nested/hierarchical data, or are primarily building with AI agents.
If you're looking for a solution that combines the flexibility of the document model with the ease of a backend-as-a-service, check out Appwrite Databases. It's designed to support fast, iterative development for modern applications.
