| 1 | =head1 NAME
|
|---|
| 2 | X<warning, lexical> X<warnings> X<warning>
|
|---|
| 3 |
|
|---|
| 4 | perllexwarn - Perl Lexical Warnings
|
|---|
| 5 |
|
|---|
| 6 | =head1 DESCRIPTION
|
|---|
| 7 |
|
|---|
| 8 | The C<use warnings> pragma is a replacement for both the command line
|
|---|
| 9 | flag B<-w> and the equivalent Perl variable, C<$^W>.
|
|---|
| 10 |
|
|---|
| 11 | The pragma works just like the existing "strict" pragma.
|
|---|
| 12 | This means that the scope of the warning pragma is limited to the
|
|---|
| 13 | enclosing block. It also means that the pragma setting will not
|
|---|
| 14 | leak across files (via C<use>, C<require> or C<do>). This allows
|
|---|
| 15 | authors to independently define the degree of warning checks that will
|
|---|
| 16 | be applied to their module.
|
|---|
| 17 |
|
|---|
| 18 | By default, optional warnings are disabled, so any legacy code that
|
|---|
| 19 | doesn't attempt to control the warnings will work unchanged.
|
|---|
| 20 |
|
|---|
| 21 | All warnings are enabled in a block by either of these:
|
|---|
| 22 |
|
|---|
| 23 | use warnings;
|
|---|
| 24 | use warnings 'all';
|
|---|
| 25 |
|
|---|
| 26 | Similarly all warnings are disabled in a block by either of these:
|
|---|
| 27 |
|
|---|
| 28 | no warnings;
|
|---|
| 29 | no warnings 'all';
|
|---|
| 30 |
|
|---|
| 31 | For example, consider the code below:
|
|---|
| 32 |
|
|---|
| 33 | use warnings;
|
|---|
| 34 | my @a;
|
|---|
| 35 | {
|
|---|
| 36 | no warnings;
|
|---|
| 37 | my $b = @a[0];
|
|---|
| 38 | }
|
|---|
| 39 | my $c = @a[0];
|
|---|
| 40 |
|
|---|
| 41 | The code in the enclosing block has warnings enabled, but the inner
|
|---|
| 42 | block has them disabled. In this case that means the assignment to the
|
|---|
| 43 | scalar C<$c> will trip the C<"Scalar value @a[0] better written as $a[0]">
|
|---|
| 44 | warning, but the assignment to the scalar C<$b> will not.
|
|---|
| 45 |
|
|---|
| 46 | =head2 Default Warnings and Optional Warnings
|
|---|
| 47 |
|
|---|
| 48 | Before the introduction of lexical warnings, Perl had two classes of
|
|---|
| 49 | warnings: mandatory and optional.
|
|---|
| 50 |
|
|---|
| 51 | As its name suggests, if your code tripped a mandatory warning, you
|
|---|
| 52 | would get a warning whether you wanted it or not.
|
|---|
| 53 | For example, the code below would always produce an C<"isn't numeric">
|
|---|
| 54 | warning about the "2:".
|
|---|
| 55 |
|
|---|
| 56 | my $a = "2:" + 3;
|
|---|
| 57 |
|
|---|
| 58 | With the introduction of lexical warnings, mandatory warnings now become
|
|---|
| 59 | I<default> warnings. The difference is that although the previously
|
|---|
| 60 | mandatory warnings are still enabled by default, they can then be
|
|---|
| 61 | subsequently enabled or disabled with the lexical warning pragma. For
|
|---|
| 62 | example, in the code below, an C<"isn't numeric"> warning will only
|
|---|
| 63 | be reported for the C<$a> variable.
|
|---|
| 64 |
|
|---|
| 65 | my $a = "2:" + 3;
|
|---|
| 66 | no warnings;
|
|---|
| 67 | my $b = "2:" + 3;
|
|---|
| 68 |
|
|---|
| 69 | Note that neither the B<-w> flag or the C<$^W> can be used to
|
|---|
| 70 | disable/enable default warnings. They are still mandatory in this case.
|
|---|
| 71 |
|
|---|
| 72 | =head2 What's wrong with B<-w> and C<$^W>
|
|---|
| 73 |
|
|---|
| 74 | Although very useful, the big problem with using B<-w> on the command
|
|---|
| 75 | line to enable warnings is that it is all or nothing. Take the typical
|
|---|
| 76 | scenario when you are writing a Perl program. Parts of the code you
|
|---|
| 77 | will write yourself, but it's very likely that you will make use of
|
|---|
| 78 | pre-written Perl modules. If you use the B<-w> flag in this case, you
|
|---|
| 79 | end up enabling warnings in pieces of code that you haven't written.
|
|---|
| 80 |
|
|---|
| 81 | Similarly, using C<$^W> to either disable or enable blocks of code is
|
|---|
| 82 | fundamentally flawed. For a start, say you want to disable warnings in
|
|---|
| 83 | a block of code. You might expect this to be enough to do the trick:
|
|---|
| 84 |
|
|---|
| 85 | {
|
|---|
| 86 | local ($^W) = 0;
|
|---|
| 87 | my $a =+ 2;
|
|---|
| 88 | my $b; chop $b;
|
|---|
| 89 | }
|
|---|
| 90 |
|
|---|
| 91 | When this code is run with the B<-w> flag, a warning will be produced
|
|---|
| 92 | for the C<$a> line -- C<"Reversed += operator">.
|
|---|
| 93 |
|
|---|
| 94 | The problem is that Perl has both compile-time and run-time warnings. To
|
|---|
| 95 | disable compile-time warnings you need to rewrite the code like this:
|
|---|
| 96 |
|
|---|
| 97 | {
|
|---|
| 98 | BEGIN { $^W = 0 }
|
|---|
| 99 | my $a =+ 2;
|
|---|
| 100 | my $b; chop $b;
|
|---|
| 101 | }
|
|---|
| 102 |
|
|---|
| 103 | The other big problem with C<$^W> is the way you can inadvertently
|
|---|
| 104 | change the warning setting in unexpected places in your code. For example,
|
|---|
| 105 | when the code below is run (without the B<-w> flag), the second call
|
|---|
| 106 | to C<doit> will trip a C<"Use of uninitialized value"> warning, whereas
|
|---|
| 107 | the first will not.
|
|---|
| 108 |
|
|---|
| 109 | sub doit
|
|---|
| 110 | {
|
|---|
| 111 | my $b; chop $b;
|
|---|
| 112 | }
|
|---|
| 113 |
|
|---|
| 114 | doit();
|
|---|
| 115 |
|
|---|
| 116 | {
|
|---|
| 117 | local ($^W) = 1;
|
|---|
| 118 | doit()
|
|---|
| 119 | }
|
|---|
| 120 |
|
|---|
| 121 | This is a side-effect of C<$^W> being dynamically scoped.
|
|---|
| 122 |
|
|---|
| 123 | Lexical warnings get around these limitations by allowing finer control
|
|---|
| 124 | over where warnings can or can't be tripped.
|
|---|
| 125 |
|
|---|
| 126 | =head2 Controlling Warnings from the Command Line
|
|---|
| 127 |
|
|---|
| 128 | There are three Command Line flags that can be used to control when
|
|---|
| 129 | warnings are (or aren't) produced:
|
|---|
| 130 |
|
|---|
| 131 | =over 5
|
|---|
| 132 |
|
|---|
| 133 | =item B<-w>
|
|---|
| 134 | X<-w>
|
|---|
| 135 |
|
|---|
| 136 | This is the existing flag. If the lexical warnings pragma is B<not>
|
|---|
| 137 | used in any of you code, or any of the modules that you use, this flag
|
|---|
| 138 | will enable warnings everywhere. See L<Backward Compatibility> for
|
|---|
| 139 | details of how this flag interacts with lexical warnings.
|
|---|
| 140 |
|
|---|
| 141 | =item B<-W>
|
|---|
| 142 | X<-W>
|
|---|
| 143 |
|
|---|
| 144 | If the B<-W> flag is used on the command line, it will enable all warnings
|
|---|
| 145 | throughout the program regardless of whether warnings were disabled
|
|---|
| 146 | locally using C<no warnings> or C<$^W =0>. This includes all files that get
|
|---|
| 147 | included via C<use>, C<require> or C<do>.
|
|---|
| 148 | Think of it as the Perl equivalent of the "lint" command.
|
|---|
| 149 |
|
|---|
| 150 | =item B<-X>
|
|---|
| 151 | X<-X>
|
|---|
| 152 |
|
|---|
| 153 | Does the exact opposite to the B<-W> flag, i.e. it disables all warnings.
|
|---|
| 154 |
|
|---|
| 155 | =back
|
|---|
| 156 |
|
|---|
| 157 | =head2 Backward Compatibility
|
|---|
| 158 |
|
|---|
| 159 | If you are used with working with a version of Perl prior to the
|
|---|
| 160 | introduction of lexically scoped warnings, or have code that uses both
|
|---|
| 161 | lexical warnings and C<$^W>, this section will describe how they interact.
|
|---|
| 162 |
|
|---|
| 163 | How Lexical Warnings interact with B<-w>/C<$^W>:
|
|---|
| 164 |
|
|---|
| 165 | =over 5
|
|---|
| 166 |
|
|---|
| 167 | =item 1.
|
|---|
| 168 |
|
|---|
| 169 | If none of the three command line flags (B<-w>, B<-W> or B<-X>) that
|
|---|
| 170 | control warnings is used and neither C<$^W> or the C<warnings> pragma
|
|---|
| 171 | are used, then default warnings will be enabled and optional warnings
|
|---|
| 172 | disabled.
|
|---|
| 173 | This means that legacy code that doesn't attempt to control the warnings
|
|---|
| 174 | will work unchanged.
|
|---|
| 175 |
|
|---|
| 176 | =item 2.
|
|---|
| 177 |
|
|---|
| 178 | The B<-w> flag just sets the global C<$^W> variable as in 5.005 -- this
|
|---|
| 179 | means that any legacy code that currently relies on manipulating C<$^W>
|
|---|
| 180 | to control warning behavior will still work as is.
|
|---|
| 181 |
|
|---|
| 182 | =item 3.
|
|---|
| 183 |
|
|---|
| 184 | Apart from now being a boolean, the C<$^W> variable operates in exactly
|
|---|
| 185 | the same horrible uncontrolled global way, except that it cannot
|
|---|
| 186 | disable/enable default warnings.
|
|---|
| 187 |
|
|---|
| 188 | =item 4.
|
|---|
| 189 |
|
|---|
| 190 | If a piece of code is under the control of the C<warnings> pragma,
|
|---|
| 191 | both the C<$^W> variable and the B<-w> flag will be ignored for the
|
|---|
| 192 | scope of the lexical warning.
|
|---|
| 193 |
|
|---|
| 194 | =item 5.
|
|---|
| 195 |
|
|---|
| 196 | The only way to override a lexical warnings setting is with the B<-W>
|
|---|
| 197 | or B<-X> command line flags.
|
|---|
| 198 |
|
|---|
| 199 | =back
|
|---|
| 200 |
|
|---|
| 201 | The combined effect of 3 & 4 is that it will allow code which uses
|
|---|
| 202 | the C<warnings> pragma to control the warning behavior of $^W-type
|
|---|
| 203 | code (using a C<local $^W=0>) if it really wants to, but not vice-versa.
|
|---|
| 204 |
|
|---|
| 205 | =head2 Category Hierarchy
|
|---|
| 206 | X<warning, categories>
|
|---|
| 207 |
|
|---|
| 208 | A hierarchy of "categories" have been defined to allow groups of warnings
|
|---|
| 209 | to be enabled/disabled in isolation.
|
|---|
| 210 |
|
|---|
| 211 | The current hierarchy is:
|
|---|
| 212 |
|
|---|
| 213 | all -+
|
|---|
| 214 | |
|
|---|
| 215 | +- closure
|
|---|
| 216 | |
|
|---|
| 217 | +- deprecated
|
|---|
| 218 | |
|
|---|
| 219 | +- exiting
|
|---|
| 220 | |
|
|---|
| 221 | +- glob
|
|---|
| 222 | |
|
|---|
| 223 | +- io -----------+
|
|---|
| 224 | | |
|
|---|
| 225 | | +- closed
|
|---|
| 226 | | |
|
|---|
| 227 | | +- exec
|
|---|
| 228 | | |
|
|---|
| 229 | | +- layer
|
|---|
| 230 | | |
|
|---|
| 231 | | +- newline
|
|---|
| 232 | | |
|
|---|
| 233 | | +- pipe
|
|---|
| 234 | | |
|
|---|
| 235 | | +- unopened
|
|---|
| 236 | |
|
|---|
| 237 | +- misc
|
|---|
| 238 | |
|
|---|
| 239 | +- numeric
|
|---|
| 240 | |
|
|---|
| 241 | +- once
|
|---|
| 242 | |
|
|---|
| 243 | +- overflow
|
|---|
| 244 | |
|
|---|
| 245 | +- pack
|
|---|
| 246 | |
|
|---|
| 247 | +- portable
|
|---|
| 248 | |
|
|---|
| 249 | +- recursion
|
|---|
| 250 | |
|
|---|
| 251 | +- redefine
|
|---|
| 252 | |
|
|---|
| 253 | +- regexp
|
|---|
| 254 | |
|
|---|
| 255 | +- severe -------+
|
|---|
| 256 | | |
|
|---|
| 257 | | +- debugging
|
|---|
| 258 | | |
|
|---|
| 259 | | +- inplace
|
|---|
| 260 | | |
|
|---|
| 261 | | +- internal
|
|---|
| 262 | | |
|
|---|
| 263 | | +- malloc
|
|---|
| 264 | |
|
|---|
| 265 | +- signal
|
|---|
| 266 | |
|
|---|
| 267 | +- substr
|
|---|
| 268 | |
|
|---|
| 269 | +- syntax -------+
|
|---|
| 270 | | |
|
|---|
| 271 | | +- ambiguous
|
|---|
| 272 | | |
|
|---|
| 273 | | +- bareword
|
|---|
| 274 | | |
|
|---|
| 275 | | +- digit
|
|---|
| 276 | | |
|
|---|
| 277 | | +- parenthesis
|
|---|
| 278 | | |
|
|---|
| 279 | | +- precedence
|
|---|
| 280 | | |
|
|---|
| 281 | | +- printf
|
|---|
| 282 | | |
|
|---|
| 283 | | +- prototype
|
|---|
| 284 | | |
|
|---|
| 285 | | +- qw
|
|---|
| 286 | | |
|
|---|
| 287 | | +- reserved
|
|---|
| 288 | | |
|
|---|
| 289 | | +- semicolon
|
|---|
| 290 | |
|
|---|
| 291 | +- taint
|
|---|
| 292 | |
|
|---|
| 293 | +- threads
|
|---|
| 294 | |
|
|---|
| 295 | +- uninitialized
|
|---|
| 296 | |
|
|---|
| 297 | +- unpack
|
|---|
| 298 | |
|
|---|
| 299 | +- untie
|
|---|
| 300 | |
|
|---|
| 301 | +- utf8
|
|---|
| 302 | |
|
|---|
| 303 | +- void
|
|---|
| 304 | |
|
|---|
| 305 | +- y2k
|
|---|
| 306 |
|
|---|
| 307 | Just like the "strict" pragma any of these categories can be combined
|
|---|
| 308 |
|
|---|
| 309 | use warnings qw(void redefine);
|
|---|
| 310 | no warnings qw(io syntax untie);
|
|---|
| 311 |
|
|---|
| 312 | Also like the "strict" pragma, if there is more than one instance of the
|
|---|
| 313 | C<warnings> pragma in a given scope the cumulative effect is additive.
|
|---|
| 314 |
|
|---|
| 315 | use warnings qw(void); # only "void" warnings enabled
|
|---|
| 316 | ...
|
|---|
| 317 | use warnings qw(io); # only "void" & "io" warnings enabled
|
|---|
| 318 | ...
|
|---|
| 319 | no warnings qw(void); # only "io" warnings enabled
|
|---|
| 320 |
|
|---|
| 321 | To determine which category a specific warning has been assigned to see
|
|---|
| 322 | L<perldiag>.
|
|---|
| 323 |
|
|---|
| 324 | Note: In Perl 5.6.1, the lexical warnings category "deprecated" was a
|
|---|
| 325 | sub-category of the "syntax" category. It is now a top-level category
|
|---|
| 326 | in its own right.
|
|---|
| 327 |
|
|---|
| 328 |
|
|---|
| 329 | =head2 Fatal Warnings
|
|---|
| 330 | X<warning, fatal>
|
|---|
| 331 |
|
|---|
| 332 | The presence of the word "FATAL" in the category list will escalate any
|
|---|
| 333 | warnings detected from the categories specified in the lexical scope
|
|---|
| 334 | into fatal errors. In the code below, the use of C<time>, C<length>
|
|---|
| 335 | and C<join> can all produce a C<"Useless use of xxx in void context">
|
|---|
| 336 | warning.
|
|---|
| 337 |
|
|---|
| 338 | use warnings;
|
|---|
| 339 |
|
|---|
| 340 | time;
|
|---|
| 341 |
|
|---|
| 342 | {
|
|---|
| 343 | use warnings FATAL => qw(void);
|
|---|
| 344 | length "abc";
|
|---|
| 345 | }
|
|---|
| 346 |
|
|---|
| 347 | join "", 1,2,3;
|
|---|
| 348 |
|
|---|
| 349 | print "done\n";
|
|---|
| 350 |
|
|---|
| 351 | When run it produces this output
|
|---|
| 352 |
|
|---|
| 353 | Useless use of time in void context at fatal line 3.
|
|---|
| 354 | Useless use of length in void context at fatal line 7.
|
|---|
| 355 |
|
|---|
| 356 | The scope where C<length> is used has escalated the C<void> warnings
|
|---|
| 357 | category into a fatal error, so the program terminates immediately it
|
|---|
| 358 | encounters the warning.
|
|---|
| 359 |
|
|---|
| 360 | To explicitly turn off a "FATAL" warning you just disable the warning
|
|---|
| 361 | it is associated with. So, for example, to disable the "void" warning
|
|---|
| 362 | in the example above, either of these will do the trick:
|
|---|
| 363 |
|
|---|
| 364 | no warnings qw(void);
|
|---|
| 365 | no warnings FATAL => qw(void);
|
|---|
| 366 |
|
|---|
| 367 | If you want to downgrade a warning that has been escalated into a fatal
|
|---|
| 368 | error back to a normal warning, you can use the "NONFATAL" keyword. For
|
|---|
| 369 | example, the code below will promote all warnings into fatal errors,
|
|---|
| 370 | except for those in the "syntax" category.
|
|---|
| 371 |
|
|---|
| 372 | use warnings FATAL => 'all', NONFATAL => 'syntax';
|
|---|
| 373 |
|
|---|
| 374 | =head2 Reporting Warnings from a Module
|
|---|
| 375 | X<warning, reporting> X<warning, registering>
|
|---|
| 376 |
|
|---|
| 377 | The C<warnings> pragma provides a number of functions that are useful for
|
|---|
| 378 | module authors. These are used when you want to report a module-specific
|
|---|
| 379 | warning to a calling module has enabled warnings via the C<warnings>
|
|---|
| 380 | pragma.
|
|---|
| 381 |
|
|---|
| 382 | Consider the module C<MyMod::Abc> below.
|
|---|
| 383 |
|
|---|
| 384 | package MyMod::Abc;
|
|---|
| 385 |
|
|---|
| 386 | use warnings::register;
|
|---|
| 387 |
|
|---|
| 388 | sub open {
|
|---|
| 389 | my $path = shift;
|
|---|
| 390 | if ($path !~ m#^/#) {
|
|---|
| 391 | warnings::warn("changing relative path to /var/abc")
|
|---|
| 392 | if warnings::enabled();
|
|---|
| 393 | $path = "/var/abc/$path";
|
|---|
| 394 | }
|
|---|
| 395 | }
|
|---|
| 396 |
|
|---|
| 397 | 1;
|
|---|
| 398 |
|
|---|
| 399 | The call to C<warnings::register> will create a new warnings category
|
|---|
| 400 | called "MyMod::abc", i.e. the new category name matches the current
|
|---|
| 401 | package name. The C<open> function in the module will display a warning
|
|---|
| 402 | message if it gets given a relative path as a parameter. This warnings
|
|---|
| 403 | will only be displayed if the code that uses C<MyMod::Abc> has actually
|
|---|
| 404 | enabled them with the C<warnings> pragma like below.
|
|---|
| 405 |
|
|---|
| 406 | use MyMod::Abc;
|
|---|
| 407 | use warnings 'MyMod::Abc';
|
|---|
| 408 | ...
|
|---|
| 409 | abc::open("../fred.txt");
|
|---|
| 410 |
|
|---|
| 411 | It is also possible to test whether the pre-defined warnings categories are
|
|---|
| 412 | set in the calling module with the C<warnings::enabled> function. Consider
|
|---|
| 413 | this snippet of code:
|
|---|
| 414 |
|
|---|
| 415 | package MyMod::Abc;
|
|---|
| 416 |
|
|---|
| 417 | sub open {
|
|---|
| 418 | warnings::warnif("deprecated",
|
|---|
| 419 | "open is deprecated, use new instead");
|
|---|
| 420 | new(@_);
|
|---|
| 421 | }
|
|---|
| 422 |
|
|---|
| 423 | sub new
|
|---|
| 424 | ...
|
|---|
| 425 | 1;
|
|---|
| 426 |
|
|---|
| 427 | The function C<open> has been deprecated, so code has been included to
|
|---|
| 428 | display a warning message whenever the calling module has (at least) the
|
|---|
| 429 | "deprecated" warnings category enabled. Something like this, say.
|
|---|
| 430 |
|
|---|
| 431 | use warnings 'deprecated';
|
|---|
| 432 | use MyMod::Abc;
|
|---|
| 433 | ...
|
|---|
| 434 | MyMod::Abc::open($filename);
|
|---|
| 435 |
|
|---|
| 436 | Either the C<warnings::warn> or C<warnings::warnif> function should be
|
|---|
| 437 | used to actually display the warnings message. This is because they can
|
|---|
| 438 | make use of the feature that allows warnings to be escalated into fatal
|
|---|
| 439 | errors. So in this case
|
|---|
| 440 |
|
|---|
| 441 | use MyMod::Abc;
|
|---|
| 442 | use warnings FATAL => 'MyMod::Abc';
|
|---|
| 443 | ...
|
|---|
| 444 | MyMod::Abc::open('../fred.txt');
|
|---|
| 445 |
|
|---|
| 446 | the C<warnings::warnif> function will detect this and die after
|
|---|
| 447 | displaying the warning message.
|
|---|
| 448 |
|
|---|
| 449 | The three warnings functions, C<warnings::warn>, C<warnings::warnif>
|
|---|
| 450 | and C<warnings::enabled> can optionally take an object reference in place
|
|---|
| 451 | of a category name. In this case the functions will use the class name
|
|---|
| 452 | of the object as the warnings category.
|
|---|
| 453 |
|
|---|
| 454 | Consider this example:
|
|---|
| 455 |
|
|---|
| 456 | package Original;
|
|---|
| 457 |
|
|---|
| 458 | no warnings;
|
|---|
| 459 | use warnings::register;
|
|---|
| 460 |
|
|---|
| 461 | sub new
|
|---|
| 462 | {
|
|---|
| 463 | my $class = shift;
|
|---|
| 464 | bless [], $class;
|
|---|
| 465 | }
|
|---|
| 466 |
|
|---|
| 467 | sub check
|
|---|
| 468 | {
|
|---|
| 469 | my $self = shift;
|
|---|
| 470 | my $value = shift;
|
|---|
| 471 |
|
|---|
| 472 | if ($value % 2 && warnings::enabled($self))
|
|---|
| 473 | { warnings::warn($self, "Odd numbers are unsafe") }
|
|---|
| 474 | }
|
|---|
| 475 |
|
|---|
| 476 | sub doit
|
|---|
| 477 | {
|
|---|
| 478 | my $self = shift;
|
|---|
| 479 | my $value = shift;
|
|---|
| 480 | $self->check($value);
|
|---|
| 481 | # ...
|
|---|
| 482 | }
|
|---|
| 483 |
|
|---|
| 484 | 1;
|
|---|
| 485 |
|
|---|
| 486 | package Derived;
|
|---|
| 487 |
|
|---|
| 488 | use warnings::register;
|
|---|
| 489 | use Original;
|
|---|
| 490 | our @ISA = qw( Original );
|
|---|
| 491 | sub new
|
|---|
| 492 | {
|
|---|
| 493 | my $class = shift;
|
|---|
| 494 | bless [], $class;
|
|---|
| 495 | }
|
|---|
| 496 |
|
|---|
| 497 |
|
|---|
| 498 | 1;
|
|---|
| 499 |
|
|---|
| 500 | The code below makes use of both modules, but it only enables warnings from
|
|---|
| 501 | C<Derived>.
|
|---|
| 502 |
|
|---|
| 503 | use Original;
|
|---|
| 504 | use Derived;
|
|---|
| 505 | use warnings 'Derived';
|
|---|
| 506 | my $a = new Original;
|
|---|
| 507 | $a->doit(1);
|
|---|
| 508 | my $b = new Derived;
|
|---|
| 509 | $a->doit(1);
|
|---|
| 510 |
|
|---|
| 511 | When this code is run only the C<Derived> object, C<$b>, will generate
|
|---|
| 512 | a warning.
|
|---|
| 513 |
|
|---|
| 514 | Odd numbers are unsafe at main.pl line 7
|
|---|
| 515 |
|
|---|
| 516 | Notice also that the warning is reported at the line where the object is first
|
|---|
| 517 | used.
|
|---|
| 518 |
|
|---|
| 519 | =head1 TODO
|
|---|
| 520 |
|
|---|
| 521 | perl5db.pl
|
|---|
| 522 | The debugger saves and restores C<$^W> at runtime. I haven't checked
|
|---|
| 523 | whether the debugger will still work with the lexical warnings
|
|---|
| 524 | patch applied.
|
|---|
| 525 |
|
|---|
| 526 | diagnostics.pm
|
|---|
| 527 | I *think* I've got diagnostics to work with the lexical warnings
|
|---|
| 528 | patch, but there were design decisions made in diagnostics to work
|
|---|
| 529 | around the limitations of C<$^W>. Now that those limitations are gone,
|
|---|
| 530 | the module should be revisited.
|
|---|
| 531 |
|
|---|
| 532 | document calling the warnings::* functions from XS
|
|---|
| 533 |
|
|---|
| 534 | =head1 SEE ALSO
|
|---|
| 535 |
|
|---|
| 536 | L<warnings>, L<perldiag>.
|
|---|
| 537 |
|
|---|
| 538 | =head1 AUTHOR
|
|---|
| 539 |
|
|---|
| 540 | Paul Marquess
|
|---|